Why Did Income Inequality in Germany Not Increase Further After 2005?

Martin Biewen, Martin Ungerer, Max Löffler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

While income inequality in Germany considerably increased in the years before 2005, this trend stopped after 2005. We address the question of what factors were responsible for the break in the inequality trend after 2005. Our analysis suggests that income inequality in Germany did not continue to rise after 2005 for the following reasons. First, we observe that the general rise in wage inequality that explained a lot of the inequality increase before 2005, became less steep (but did not stop) after 2005. Second, despite further increases in wage inequality after 2005, inequality in annual labour incomes did not increase further after 2005 because increased within‐year employment opportunities compensated otherwise rising inequality in annual labour incomes. Third, income inequality did not fall in a more marked way after 2005 because also the middle and the upper part of the distribution benefited from the employment boom after 2006. Finally, we provide evidence that the effect of a wide range of other factors that are often suspected to have influenced the distribution such as capital incomes, household structures, population ageing, changes in the tax and transfer system and the financial crisis of 2008 did not significantly alter the distribution after 2005.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)471–504
Number of pages34
JournalGerman Economic Review
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2019

Keywords

  • income inequality
  • poverty
  • Income inequality

Cite this

Biewen, Martin ; Ungerer, Martin ; Löffler, Max. / Why Did Income Inequality in Germany Not Increase Further After 2005?. In: German Economic Review. 2019 ; Vol. 20, No. 4. pp. 471–504.
@article{c618c8770a7041f88c580850e27e3ef1,
title = "Why Did Income Inequality in Germany Not Increase Further After 2005?",
abstract = "While income inequality in Germany considerably increased in the years before 2005, this trend stopped after 2005. We address the question of what factors were responsible for the break in the inequality trend after 2005. Our analysis suggests that income inequality in Germany did not continue to rise after 2005 for the following reasons. First, we observe that the general rise in wage inequality that explained a lot of the inequality increase before 2005, became less steep (but did not stop) after 2005. Second, despite further increases in wage inequality after 2005, inequality in annual labour incomes did not increase further after 2005 because increased within‐year employment opportunities compensated otherwise rising inequality in annual labour incomes. Third, income inequality did not fall in a more marked way after 2005 because also the middle and the upper part of the distribution benefited from the employment boom after 2006. Finally, we provide evidence that the effect of a wide range of other factors that are often suspected to have influenced the distribution such as capital incomes, household structures, population ageing, changes in the tax and transfer system and the financial crisis of 2008 did not significantly alter the distribution after 2005.",
keywords = "income inequality, poverty, Income inequality",
author = "Martin Biewen and Martin Ungerer and Max L{\"o}ffler",
note = "data source: German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP), version 29, data of the years 1984–2012, DOI: 10.5684/soep.v29",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1111/geer.12153",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "471–504",
journal = "German Economic Review",
issn = "1465-6485",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

Why Did Income Inequality in Germany Not Increase Further After 2005? / Biewen, Martin; Ungerer, Martin; Löffler, Max.

In: German Economic Review, Vol. 20, No. 4, 11.2019, p. 471–504.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why Did Income Inequality in Germany Not Increase Further After 2005?

AU - Biewen, Martin

AU - Ungerer, Martin

AU - Löffler, Max

N1 - data source: German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP), version 29, data of the years 1984–2012, DOI: 10.5684/soep.v29

PY - 2019/11

Y1 - 2019/11

N2 - While income inequality in Germany considerably increased in the years before 2005, this trend stopped after 2005. We address the question of what factors were responsible for the break in the inequality trend after 2005. Our analysis suggests that income inequality in Germany did not continue to rise after 2005 for the following reasons. First, we observe that the general rise in wage inequality that explained a lot of the inequality increase before 2005, became less steep (but did not stop) after 2005. Second, despite further increases in wage inequality after 2005, inequality in annual labour incomes did not increase further after 2005 because increased within‐year employment opportunities compensated otherwise rising inequality in annual labour incomes. Third, income inequality did not fall in a more marked way after 2005 because also the middle and the upper part of the distribution benefited from the employment boom after 2006. Finally, we provide evidence that the effect of a wide range of other factors that are often suspected to have influenced the distribution such as capital incomes, household structures, population ageing, changes in the tax and transfer system and the financial crisis of 2008 did not significantly alter the distribution after 2005.

AB - While income inequality in Germany considerably increased in the years before 2005, this trend stopped after 2005. We address the question of what factors were responsible for the break in the inequality trend after 2005. Our analysis suggests that income inequality in Germany did not continue to rise after 2005 for the following reasons. First, we observe that the general rise in wage inequality that explained a lot of the inequality increase before 2005, became less steep (but did not stop) after 2005. Second, despite further increases in wage inequality after 2005, inequality in annual labour incomes did not increase further after 2005 because increased within‐year employment opportunities compensated otherwise rising inequality in annual labour incomes. Third, income inequality did not fall in a more marked way after 2005 because also the middle and the upper part of the distribution benefited from the employment boom after 2006. Finally, we provide evidence that the effect of a wide range of other factors that are often suspected to have influenced the distribution such as capital incomes, household structures, population ageing, changes in the tax and transfer system and the financial crisis of 2008 did not significantly alter the distribution after 2005.

KW - income inequality

KW - poverty

KW - Income inequality

U2 - 10.1111/geer.12153

DO - 10.1111/geer.12153

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 471

EP - 504

JO - German Economic Review

JF - German Economic Review

SN - 1465-6485

IS - 4

ER -