Who Follows eHealth Interventions as Recommended? A Study of Participants' Personal Characteristics From the Experimental Arm of a Randomized Controlled Trial

D.A. Reinwand*, D.N. Schulz, R. Crutzen, S.P.J. Kremers, H. de Vries

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Computer-tailored eHealth interventions to improve health behavior have been demonstrated to be effective and cost-effective if they are used as recommended. However, different subgroups may use the Internet differently, which might also affect intervention use and effectiveness. To date, there is little research available depicting whether adherence to intervention recommendations differs according to personal characteristics. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to assess which personal characteristics are associated with using an eHealth intervention as recommended. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted among a sample of the adult Dutch population (N=1638) testing an intervention aimed at improving 5 healthy lifestyle behaviors: increasing fruit and vegetable consumption, increasing physical activity, reducing alcohol intake, and promoting smoking cessation. Participants were asked to participate in those specific online modules for which they did not meet the national guideline(s) for the respective behavior(s). Participants who started with fewer than the recommended number of modules of the intervention were defined as users who did not follow the intervention recommendation. RESULTS: The fewer modules recommended to participants, the better participants adhered to the intervention modules. Following the intervention recommendation increased when participants were older (chi(2) 1=39.8, P<.001), female (chi(2) 1=15.8, P<.001), unemployed (chi(2) 1=7.9, P=.003), ill (chi(2) 1=4.5, P=.02), or in a relationship (chi(2) 1=7.8, P=.003). No significant relevant differences were found between groups with different levels of education, incomes, or quality of life. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that eHealth interventions were used differently by subgroups. The more frequent as-recommended intervention use by unemployed, older, and ill participants may be an indication that these eHealth interventions are attractive to people with a greater need for health care information. Further research is necessary to make intervention use more attractive for people with unhealthy lifestyle patterns.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere115
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Medical Internet Research
Volume17
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2015

Keywords

  • eHealth
  • Web-based intervention
  • intervention use
  • computer tailoring
  • personal characteristics
  • health lifestyle
  • multiple health behaviors
  • intervention adherence
  • socioeconomic status
  • HEALTH-BEHAVIOR-CHANGE
  • TAILORED PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY
  • LIFE-STYLE INTERVENTION
  • SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS
  • INTERNET USE
  • INFORMATION-SEEKING
  • PRINT COMMUNICATION
  • ECONOMIC-EVALUATION
  • COST-EFFECTIVENESS
  • DIGITAL DIVIDE

Cite this