Where I come from and how I got here: assessing credibility in asylum cases

Tanja S. van Veldhuizen

Research output: ThesisDoctoral ThesisInternal

4022 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Asylum seekers are expected to tell a credible story about who they are, where they come from and why they fled. Asylum officials evaluate this story through a series of interviews. This dissertation found that many asylum officials ask closed questions that do not give asylum seekers the room to tell their stories in their own words. In addition, few of these questions align with what most people know about their home environment. As a result, they do not accurately test reality. This study presents several recommendations for improvement, such as asking more open-ended questions in a way that aligns with the asylum seekers perception of the world.
Original languageEnglish
Awarding Institution
  • Maastricht University
Supervisors/Advisors
  • van Koppen, Peter, Supervisor
  • Granhag, P.A., Supervisor, External person
  • Horselenberg, Robert, Advisor
  • Landström, Sara, Advisor, External person
Award date22 Sep 2017
Place of PublicationEnschede
Publisher
Print ISBNs9789462337015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • asylum seekers
  • credibility
  • questioning
  • origin
  • interviews

Cite this

van Veldhuizen, Tanja S.. / Where I come from and how I got here : assessing credibility in asylum cases. Enschede : Gildeprint Drukkerijen, 2017. 241 p.
@phdthesis{2717ec68246c486a887e8842c472bfd6,
title = "Where I come from and how I got here: assessing credibility in asylum cases",
abstract = "Asylum seekers are expected to tell a credible story about who they are, where they come from and why they fled. Asylum officials evaluate this story through a series of interviews. This dissertation found that many asylum officials ask closed questions that do not give asylum seekers the room to tell their stories in their own words. In addition, few of these questions align with what most people know about their home environment. As a result, they do not accurately test reality. This study presents several recommendations for improvement, such as asking more open-ended questions in a way that aligns with the asylum seekers perception of the world.",
keywords = "asylum seekers, credibility, questioning, origin, interviews",
author = "{van Veldhuizen}, {Tanja S.}",
note = "Joint Degree University of Gothenburg-UM",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.26481/dis.20170922tsv",
language = "English",
isbn = "9789462337015",
publisher = "Gildeprint Drukkerijen",
school = "Maastricht University",

}

Where I come from and how I got here : assessing credibility in asylum cases. / van Veldhuizen, Tanja S.

Enschede : Gildeprint Drukkerijen, 2017. 241 p.

Research output: ThesisDoctoral ThesisInternal

TY - THES

T1 - Where I come from and how I got here

T2 - assessing credibility in asylum cases

AU - van Veldhuizen, Tanja S.

N1 - Joint Degree University of Gothenburg-UM

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Asylum seekers are expected to tell a credible story about who they are, where they come from and why they fled. Asylum officials evaluate this story through a series of interviews. This dissertation found that many asylum officials ask closed questions that do not give asylum seekers the room to tell their stories in their own words. In addition, few of these questions align with what most people know about their home environment. As a result, they do not accurately test reality. This study presents several recommendations for improvement, such as asking more open-ended questions in a way that aligns with the asylum seekers perception of the world.

AB - Asylum seekers are expected to tell a credible story about who they are, where they come from and why they fled. Asylum officials evaluate this story through a series of interviews. This dissertation found that many asylum officials ask closed questions that do not give asylum seekers the room to tell their stories in their own words. In addition, few of these questions align with what most people know about their home environment. As a result, they do not accurately test reality. This study presents several recommendations for improvement, such as asking more open-ended questions in a way that aligns with the asylum seekers perception of the world.

KW - asylum seekers

KW - credibility

KW - questioning

KW - origin

KW - interviews

U2 - 10.26481/dis.20170922tsv

DO - 10.26481/dis.20170922tsv

M3 - Doctoral Thesis

SN - 9789462337015

PB - Gildeprint Drukkerijen

CY - Enschede

ER -