When to co-create education: comparing co-creation discussions before and after a course

Tanguy A. W. B. Dewaele*, Stephanie N. E. Meeuwissen, Jeroen J. G. van Merrienboer, Marjan Vermeulen, Karen D. Konings

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Teachers can co-create education with students at different moments. To maximise advantages of co-creation, we need to understand how timing impacts the nature of co-creation discussions. We therefore aimed to identify differences and similarities in the content of co-creation discussions that took place before and after participation in a course. Fifty-seven medical residents who participated in a patient safety course, were divided in seven groups; four groups co-created beforehand, three groups afterwards. We used template analysis, informed by the 4C/ID model. Groups co-creating beforehand explored design possibilities as course builders, whereas groups co-creating afterwards worked as course content improvers. Complementary strengths of co-creation beforehand and afterwards suggest combining different moments of co-creation.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages15
JournalInternational Journal for Academic Development
Early online date1 Dec 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Dec 2023

Keywords

  • 4C/ID
  • co-creation
  • course design
  • student involvement
  • DESIGN
  • CURRICULUM
  • STUDENTS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When to co-create education: comparing co-creation discussions before and after a course'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this