When Both Sides are Mistaken: Layperson and Legal Professionals' Misconceptions of Canadian Suspects' Legal Rights Upon Arrest

M.W. Patry*, C.J. Connors, N.M. Adams-Quackenbush, S.M. Smith

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Canadian criminal suspects have notably limited access to legal counsel upon arrest compared to suspects in the U.S. Additionally, prior research has shown significant misunderstanding of police warnings informing suspects of their rights upon arrest. This paper presents three studies on Canadians' comprehension of criminal suspects' rights upon arrest, with a focus on the right to counsel. Study 1 (N= 80) and Study 2 (N= 377) examined Canadian layperson's comprehension, knowledge, and perceptions of legal rights upon arrest. In turn, Study 3 (N= 78) investigated Canadian legal professionals' perceptions of laypersons' knowledge of those rights. Results from these three studies indicated there is substantial confusion about the right to counsel for Canadian criminal suspects. These results also support previous research demonstrating problems with comprehension of Canadian police cautions. Taken together, the findings of the present research pose significant concern for an increased risk of false confessions from Canadian suspects who enter an interrogation with limited knowledge and understanding of their legal right to counsel.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)56-65
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Police and Criminal Psychology
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2017

Keywords

  • interrogation
  • confession
  • right to lawyer
  • law
  • rights upon arrest
  • POLICE CAUTION ENGLAND
  • READING COMPLEXITY
  • MIRANDA WARNINGS
  • COMPREHENSION
  • COUNSEL
  • OFFENDERS
  • SILENCE
  • CONFESSIONS
  • WALES

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When Both Sides are Mistaken: Layperson and Legal Professionals' Misconceptions of Canadian Suspects' Legal Rights Upon Arrest'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this