TY - JOUR
T1 - What Is the Role of Imaging at Primary Diagnostic Work-Up in Uterine Cervical Cancer?
AU - Haldorsen, Ingfrid S.
AU - Lura, Njal
AU - Blaakaer, Jan
AU - Fischerova, Daniela
AU - Werner, Henrica M. J.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors of this manuscript have been sponsored by Bergen Research Foundation (grant number BFS2018TMT06), the Western Norway Regional Health Authority (grant number 912060), Haukeland University Hospital, and the University of Bergen, Norway. Acknowledgments
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, The Author(s).
PY - 2019/9
Y1 - 2019/9
N2 - Purpose of ReviewFor uterine cervical cancer, the recently revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system (2018) incorporates imaging and pathology assessments in its staging. In this review we summarize the reported staging performances of conventional and novel imaging methods and provide an overview of promising novel imaging methods relevant for cervical cancer patient care.Recent FindingsDiagnostic imaging during the primary diagnostic work-up is recommended to better assess tumor extent and metastatic disease and is now reflected in the 2018 FIGO stages 3C1 and 3C2 (positive pelvic and/or paraaortic lymph nodes). For pretreatment local staging, imaging by transvaginal or transrectal ultrasound (TVS, TRS) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is instrumental to define pelvic tumor extent, including a more accurate assessment of tumor size, stromal invasion depth, and parametrial invasion. In locally advanced cervical cancer, positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) or computed tomography (CT) is recommended, since the identification of metastatic lymph nodes and distant metastases has therapeutic consequences. Furthermore, novel imaging techniques offer visualization of microstructural and functional tumor characteristics, reportedly linked to clinical phenotype, thus with a potential for further improving risk stratification and individualization of treatment.SummaryDiagnostic imaging by MRI/TVS/TRS and PET-CT/CT is instrumental for pretreatment staging in uterine cervical cancer and guides optimal treatment strategy. Novel imaging techniques may also provide functional biomarkers with potential relevance for developing more targeted treatment strategies in cervical cancer.
AB - Purpose of ReviewFor uterine cervical cancer, the recently revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system (2018) incorporates imaging and pathology assessments in its staging. In this review we summarize the reported staging performances of conventional and novel imaging methods and provide an overview of promising novel imaging methods relevant for cervical cancer patient care.Recent FindingsDiagnostic imaging during the primary diagnostic work-up is recommended to better assess tumor extent and metastatic disease and is now reflected in the 2018 FIGO stages 3C1 and 3C2 (positive pelvic and/or paraaortic lymph nodes). For pretreatment local staging, imaging by transvaginal or transrectal ultrasound (TVS, TRS) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is instrumental to define pelvic tumor extent, including a more accurate assessment of tumor size, stromal invasion depth, and parametrial invasion. In locally advanced cervical cancer, positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) or computed tomography (CT) is recommended, since the identification of metastatic lymph nodes and distant metastases has therapeutic consequences. Furthermore, novel imaging techniques offer visualization of microstructural and functional tumor characteristics, reportedly linked to clinical phenotype, thus with a potential for further improving risk stratification and individualization of treatment.SummaryDiagnostic imaging by MRI/TVS/TRS and PET-CT/CT is instrumental for pretreatment staging in uterine cervical cancer and guides optimal treatment strategy. Novel imaging techniques may also provide functional biomarkers with potential relevance for developing more targeted treatment strategies in cervical cancer.
KW - Cervical cancer
KW - Transvaginal ultrasound
KW - Magnetic resonance imaging
KW - Diffusion-weighted imaging
KW - Positron emission tomography
KW - Imaging biomarkers
KW - APPARENT DIFFUSION-COEFFICIENT
KW - CONTRAST-ENHANCED MRI
KW - PREDICTING PARAMETRIAL INVASION
KW - LYMPH-NODE METASTASES
KW - EARLY-STAGE
KW - CONCURRENT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY
KW - INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION
KW - TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND
KW - RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY
KW - RADIATION-THERAPY
U2 - 10.1007/s11912-019-0824-0
DO - 10.1007/s11912-019-0824-0
M3 - (Systematic) Review article
C2 - 31359169
SN - 1523-3790
VL - 21
JO - Current Oncology Reports
JF - Current Oncology Reports
IS - 9
M1 - 77
ER -