What if you went to the police and accused your uncle of abuse? Misunderstandings concerning the benefits of memory distortion: a commentary on Fernandez (2015)

H. Otgaar, M.L. Howe, A. Clark, J.Q. Wang, H. Merckelbach

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In a recent paper, Fernandez (2015) argues that memory distortion can have beneficial outcomes. Although we agree with this, we find his reasoning and examples flawed to such degree that they will lead to misunderstandings rather than clarification in the field of memory (distortion). In his paper, Fernandez uses the terms belief and memory incorrectly, creating a conceptual blur. Also, Fernandez tries to make the case that under certain circumstances, false memories of abuse are beneficial. We argue against this idea as the reasoning behind this claim is based on controversial assumptions such as repression. Although it is true that memory distortions can be beneficial, the examples sketched by Fernandez are not in line with recent documentation in this area. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)286-290
Number of pages5
JournalConsciousness and Cognition
Volume33
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2015

Keywords

  • AMNESIA
  • Adaptive memory
  • Belief
  • CHILDREN
  • EVENTS
  • EXPERIENCES
  • False memory
  • Memory distortion
  • NONBELIEVED MEMORIES
  • Nonbelieved memories
  • REPRESSED MEMORY
  • Recollection
  • SCIENCE

Cite this

@article{d8368f2174e743c1a90a119a0565fe10,
title = "What if you went to the police and accused your uncle of abuse? Misunderstandings concerning the benefits of memory distortion: a commentary on Fernandez (2015)",
abstract = "In a recent paper, Fernandez (2015) argues that memory distortion can have beneficial outcomes. Although we agree with this, we find his reasoning and examples flawed to such degree that they will lead to misunderstandings rather than clarification in the field of memory (distortion). In his paper, Fernandez uses the terms belief and memory incorrectly, creating a conceptual blur. Also, Fernandez tries to make the case that under certain circumstances, false memories of abuse are beneficial. We argue against this idea as the reasoning behind this claim is based on controversial assumptions such as repression. Although it is true that memory distortions can be beneficial, the examples sketched by Fernandez are not in line with recent documentation in this area. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "AMNESIA, Adaptive memory, Belief, CHILDREN, EVENTS, EXPERIENCES, False memory, Memory distortion, NONBELIEVED MEMORIES, Nonbelieved memories, REPRESSED MEMORY, Recollection, SCIENCE",
author = "H. Otgaar and M.L. Howe and A. Clark and J.Q. Wang and H. Merckelbach",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.concog.2015.01.015",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "286--290",
journal = "Consciousness and Cognition",
issn = "1053-8100",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

What if you went to the police and accused your uncle of abuse? Misunderstandings concerning the benefits of memory distortion: a commentary on Fernandez (2015). / Otgaar, H.; Howe, M.L.; Clark, A.; Wang, J.Q.; Merckelbach, H.

In: Consciousness and Cognition, Vol. 33, 05.2015, p. 286-290.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - What if you went to the police and accused your uncle of abuse? Misunderstandings concerning the benefits of memory distortion: a commentary on Fernandez (2015)

AU - Otgaar, H.

AU - Howe, M.L.

AU - Clark, A.

AU - Wang, J.Q.

AU - Merckelbach, H.

PY - 2015/5

Y1 - 2015/5

N2 - In a recent paper, Fernandez (2015) argues that memory distortion can have beneficial outcomes. Although we agree with this, we find his reasoning and examples flawed to such degree that they will lead to misunderstandings rather than clarification in the field of memory (distortion). In his paper, Fernandez uses the terms belief and memory incorrectly, creating a conceptual blur. Also, Fernandez tries to make the case that under certain circumstances, false memories of abuse are beneficial. We argue against this idea as the reasoning behind this claim is based on controversial assumptions such as repression. Although it is true that memory distortions can be beneficial, the examples sketched by Fernandez are not in line with recent documentation in this area. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

AB - In a recent paper, Fernandez (2015) argues that memory distortion can have beneficial outcomes. Although we agree with this, we find his reasoning and examples flawed to such degree that they will lead to misunderstandings rather than clarification in the field of memory (distortion). In his paper, Fernandez uses the terms belief and memory incorrectly, creating a conceptual blur. Also, Fernandez tries to make the case that under certain circumstances, false memories of abuse are beneficial. We argue against this idea as the reasoning behind this claim is based on controversial assumptions such as repression. Although it is true that memory distortions can be beneficial, the examples sketched by Fernandez are not in line with recent documentation in this area. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

KW - AMNESIA

KW - Adaptive memory

KW - Belief

KW - CHILDREN

KW - EVENTS

KW - EXPERIENCES

KW - False memory

KW - Memory distortion

KW - NONBELIEVED MEMORIES

KW - Nonbelieved memories

KW - REPRESSED MEMORY

KW - Recollection

KW - SCIENCE

U2 - 10.1016/j.concog.2015.01.015

DO - 10.1016/j.concog.2015.01.015

M3 - Review article

VL - 33

SP - 286

EP - 290

JO - Consciousness and Cognition

JF - Consciousness and Cognition

SN - 1053-8100

ER -