TY - JOUR
T1 - What do we mean with sound semantics, exactly?
T2 - A survey of taxonomies and ontologies of everyday sounds
AU - Giordano, Bruno L.
AU - De miranda azevedo, Ricardo
AU - Formisano, Elia
AU - Dumontier, Michel
AU - Plasencia Calaña, Yeni
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the French National Research Agency (ANR-21-CE37-0027-01 to BG; ANR-16-CONV-0002 – ILCB; ANR11-LABX-0036 – BLRI), the Dutch Research Council (NWO 406.20.GO.030 to EF and MD) and by the Excellence Initiative of Aix-Marseille University (AMIDEX). EF was partially financed by the Dutch Province of Limburg. *
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 Giordano, de Miranda Azevedo, Plasencia-Calaña, Formisano and Dumontier.
PY - 2022/9/29
Y1 - 2022/9/29
N2 - Taxonomies and ontologies for the characterization of everyday sounds have been developed in several research fields, including auditory cognition, soundscape research, artificial hearing, sound design, and medicine. Here, we surveyed 36 of such knowledge organization systems, which we identified through a systematic literature search. To evaluate the semantic domains covered by these systems within a homogeneous framework, we introduced a comprehensive set of verbal sound descriptors (sound source properties; attributes of sensation; sound signal descriptors; onomatopoeias; music genres), which we used to manually label the surveyed descriptor classes. We reveal that most taxonomies and ontologies were developed to characterize higher-level semantic relations between sound sources in terms of the sound-generating objects and actions involved (what/how), or in terms of the environmental context (where). This indicates the current lack of a comprehensive ontology of everyday sounds that covers simultaneously all semantic aspects of the relation between sounds. Such an ontology may have a wide range of applications and purposes, ranging from extending our scientific knowledge of auditory processes in the real world, to developing artificial hearing systems.
AB - Taxonomies and ontologies for the characterization of everyday sounds have been developed in several research fields, including auditory cognition, soundscape research, artificial hearing, sound design, and medicine. Here, we surveyed 36 of such knowledge organization systems, which we identified through a systematic literature search. To evaluate the semantic domains covered by these systems within a homogeneous framework, we introduced a comprehensive set of verbal sound descriptors (sound source properties; attributes of sensation; sound signal descriptors; onomatopoeias; music genres), which we used to manually label the surveyed descriptor classes. We reveal that most taxonomies and ontologies were developed to characterize higher-level semantic relations between sound sources in terms of the sound-generating objects and actions involved (what/how), or in terms of the environmental context (where). This indicates the current lack of a comprehensive ontology of everyday sounds that covers simultaneously all semantic aspects of the relation between sounds. Such an ontology may have a wide range of applications and purposes, ranging from extending our scientific knowledge of auditory processes in the real world, to developing artificial hearing systems.
U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.964209
DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.964209
M3 - Article
C2 - 36312201
SN - 1664-1078
VL - 13
JO - Frontiers in Psychology
JF - Frontiers in Psychology
M1 - 964209
ER -