Welfare losses, preferences for redistribution, and political participation: Evidence from the United Kingdom’s age of austerity

Bruno Martorano, Laura Metzger, Patricia Justino

Research output: Working paper / PreprintWorking paper

140 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper studies the effect of austerity on forms of political participation—including voting, appealing for reform, and peaceful protesting—and the role of preferences for redistribution in shaping the relationship between individual exposure to austerity and political participation. The paper focuses on the case of the United Kingdom (UK) where, between 2011 and 2019, wide-ranging austerity policies were introduced to deal with high public debt in the aftermath of the 2007–08 financial crisis. Cuts to government spending on public investment, services, and social protection, especially during the initial fiscal consolidation phase of 2011–15, led to significant welfare losses for the population. We provide evidence from observational microeconomic data and a large-scale online experiment in the UK showing that individual exposure to welfare losses from austerity increases political participation and strengthens preferences for government redistribution. The experimental data suggests that changes in individual preferences for redistribution significantly shape the effect of austerity on political participation.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherUNU-MERIT
Publication statusPublished - 15 May 2023

Publication series

SeriesUNU-MERIT Working Papers
Number016
ISSN1871-9872

JEL classifications

  • d31 - Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions
  • d72 - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
  • h53 - National Government Expenditures and Welfare Programs
  • h60 - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt: General
  • i38 - "Welfare and Poverty: Government Programs; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs"

Keywords

  • austerity
  • political participation
  • redistribution
  • expenditure cuts
  • welfare loss

Cite this