We need to talk about disruption in bioethics: a commentary on Rueda, Pugh and Savulescu

Michiel De Proost; Seppe Segers

doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2022.12.001

We need to talk about disruption in bioethics: a commentary on Rueda, Pugh and Savulescu

Michiel De Proost^*
, Seppe Segers

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Rueda, Pugh, and Savulescu intervene in the debate of reprogenetic enhancement technologies that can lead to ethical disruption. In response, we think such innovations may not so much disrupt biomedical ethics but instead may reanimate older debates in this field.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	741-742
Journal	Trends in Biotechnology
Volume	41
Issue number	6
Early online date	19 Dec 2022
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2022.12.001
Publication status	Published - Jun 2023

Access to Document

10.1016/j.tibtech.2022.12.001

https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/01GMQ9XV2SPX79AC3GSVT7P0R6Licence: Other

Cite this

@article{75c3d87cb4e34724a300e15d1ed427a3,

title = "We need to talk about disruption in bioethics: a commentary on Rueda, Pugh and Savulescu",

abstract = "Rueda, Pugh, and Savulescu intervene in the debate of reprogenetic enhancement technologies that can lead to ethical disruption. In response, we think such innovations may not so much disrupt biomedical ethics but instead may reanimate older debates in this field.",

author = "\{De Proost\}, Michiel and Seppe Segers",

year = "2023",

month = jun,

doi = "10.1016/j.tibtech.2022.12.001",

language = "English",

volume = "41",

pages = "741--742",

journal = "Trends in Biotechnology",

issn = "0167-7799",

publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - We need to talk about disruption in bioethics

T2 - a commentary on Rueda, Pugh and Savulescu

AU - De Proost, Michiel

AU - Segers, Seppe

PY - 2023/6

Y1 - 2023/6

N2 - Rueda, Pugh, and Savulescu intervene in the debate of reprogenetic enhancement technologies that can lead to ethical disruption. In response, we think such innovations may not so much disrupt biomedical ethics but instead may reanimate older debates in this field.

AB - Rueda, Pugh, and Savulescu intervene in the debate of reprogenetic enhancement technologies that can lead to ethical disruption. In response, we think such innovations may not so much disrupt biomedical ethics but instead may reanimate older debates in this field.

U2 - 10.1016/j.tibtech.2022.12.001

DO - 10.1016/j.tibtech.2022.12.001

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

C2 - 36543628

SN - 0167-7799

VL - 41

SP - 741

EP - 742

JO - Trends in Biotechnology

JF - Trends in Biotechnology

IS - 6

ER -

We need to talk about disruption in bioethics: a commentary on Rueda, Pugh and Savulescu

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this