Vodafone Transfer Pricing Decision: A Mistake of Judgment

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademic

Abstract

On 10 October 2014, the Bombay High Court exercised its non-appellate jurisdiction to quash a transfer pricing claim in the case of Vodafone, in which the tax authorities sought to apply the arm’s length principle to equity financing transactions. This interpretation has been accepted by the Government of India, which has decided not to appeal against the decision of the Bombay High Court. In this contribution, the author critically analyses the controversy to find that not only was the court’s interpretation of the law potentially incorrect, but also that it decided the case out of turn, and without allowing for the facts of the case to be adequately examined.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)428-436
Number of pages9
JournalIntertax
Volume43
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2015

Cite this

@article{e44c3809954f476fbb2dae782d28d376,
title = "Vodafone Transfer Pricing Decision: A Mistake of Judgment",
abstract = "On 10 October 2014, the Bombay High Court exercised its non-appellate jurisdiction to quash a transfer pricing claim in the case of Vodafone, in which the tax authorities sought to apply the arm’s length principle to equity financing transactions. This interpretation has been accepted by the Government of India, which has decided not to appeal against the decision of the Bombay High Court. In this contribution, the author critically analyses the controversy to find that not only was the court’s interpretation of the law potentially incorrect, but also that it decided the case out of turn, and without allowing for the facts of the case to be adequately examined.",
author = "D. Sanghavi",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "428--436",
journal = "Intertax",
issn = "0165-2826",
publisher = "Kluwer Law International",
number = "5",

}

Vodafone Transfer Pricing Decision: A Mistake of Judgment. / Sanghavi, D.

In: Intertax, Vol. 43, No. 5, 01.01.2015, p. 428-436.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademic

TY - JOUR

T1 - Vodafone Transfer Pricing Decision: A Mistake of Judgment

AU - Sanghavi, D.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - On 10 October 2014, the Bombay High Court exercised its non-appellate jurisdiction to quash a transfer pricing claim in the case of Vodafone, in which the tax authorities sought to apply the arm’s length principle to equity financing transactions. This interpretation has been accepted by the Government of India, which has decided not to appeal against the decision of the Bombay High Court. In this contribution, the author critically analyses the controversy to find that not only was the court’s interpretation of the law potentially incorrect, but also that it decided the case out of turn, and without allowing for the facts of the case to be adequately examined.

AB - On 10 October 2014, the Bombay High Court exercised its non-appellate jurisdiction to quash a transfer pricing claim in the case of Vodafone, in which the tax authorities sought to apply the arm’s length principle to equity financing transactions. This interpretation has been accepted by the Government of India, which has decided not to appeal against the decision of the Bombay High Court. In this contribution, the author critically analyses the controversy to find that not only was the court’s interpretation of the law potentially incorrect, but also that it decided the case out of turn, and without allowing for the facts of the case to be adequately examined.

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 428

EP - 436

JO - Intertax

JF - Intertax

SN - 0165-2826

IS - 5

ER -