@article{a9dc2f0d73944034bbc88bb34f338903,
title = "Views of healthcare professionals about the role of active monitoring in the management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): Qualitative interview study",
abstract = "Background: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is an in-situ (pre-cancerous) breast malignancy whereby malignant cells are contained within the basement membrane of the breast ducts. Increasing awareness that some low-risk forms of DCIS might remain indolent for many years has led to concern about overtreatment, with at least 3 clinical trials underway internationally assessing the safety of active monitoring for low-risk DCIS. This study aimed to understand healthcare professionals' (HCPs) views on the management options for patients with DCIS.Methods: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with HCPs involved in the diagnosis and management of DCIS in Australia and New Zealand. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically using Framework Analysis method.Results: Twenty-six HCPs including 10 breast surgeons, 3 breast physicians, 6 radiation oncologists, and 7 breast care nurses participated. There was a strong overall consensus that DCIS requires active treatment. HCPs generally felt uncomfortable recommending active monitoring as a management option for lowrisk DCIS as they viewed this as outside current standard care. Overall, HCPs felt that active monitoring was an unproven strategy in need of an evidence base; however, many acknowledged that active monitoring for low-risk DCIS could be appropriate for patients with significant co-morbidities or limited life expectancy. They believed that most patients would opt for surgery wherever possible.Conclusions: This study highlights the important need for robust randomised controlled trial data about active monitoring for women with low-risk DCIS, to provide HCPs with confidence in their management recommendations and decision-making. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.",
keywords = "Ductal carcinoma in situ, Management, Active monitoring, Overtreatment, Qualitative, BREAST-CANCER, OUTCOMES, OVERTREATMENT, TERMINOLOGY",
author = "Brooke Nickel and Kirsten McCaffery and Nehmat Houssami and Jesse Jansen and Christobel Saunders and Andrew Spillane and Claudia Rutherford and Ann Dixon and Alexandra Barratt and Kirsty Stuart and Geraldine Robertson and Jolyn Hersch",
note = "Funding Information: This study was funded by a Sydney Catalyst Pilot & Seed Funding grant. KM is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council ( NHMRC ) Principal Research Fellowship # 1121110 and NHMRC Program Grant # 1104136 . NH is supported by a National Breast Cancer Foundation (NBCF) Cancer Research Leadership Fellowship. JH is supported by NHMRC Early Career Fellowship # 1112509 . Funding Information: DCIS is challenging to explain to patients, and there is no consensus among HCPs about what terminology to use and how best to explain what DCIS is and the risk of progression [17,18]. Not surprisingly, women are often confused about the meaning of a DCIS diagnosis [19] and have exaggerated risk perceptions and anxiety [20]. Furthermore, DCIS patients have high unmet needs for information and treatment decision support, which has important implications for women's capacity to participate in shared decision making about management [6,21,22]. Given the current challenges faced by HCPs in relation to DCIS, as well as the potential for overdiagnosis of DCIS [23] this study aimed to understand HCPs? views on the management options for DCIS as well as their benefits and harms, and explore key influences on treatment decision making. The goal of this research is to underpin communication strategies for discussion of active monitoring as a possible future management option in low-risk DCIS.This study was funded by a Sydney Catalyst Pilot & Seed Funding grant. KM is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Principal Research Fellowship #1121110 and NHMRC Program Grant #1104136. NH is supported by a National Breast Cancer Foundation (NBCF) Cancer Research Leadership Fellowship. JH is supported by NHMRC Early Career Fellowship #1112509. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 The Authors",
year = "2020",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1016/j.breast.2020.09.002",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "99--105",
journal = "Breast",
issn = "0960-9776",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
}