Validity of physical activity monitors during daily life in patients with COPD.

R.A. Rabinovich; Z. Louvaris; Y. Raste; D. Langer; H.V. Remoortel; S. Giavedoni; C. Burtin; E.M. Regueiro; I. Vogiatzis; N.S. Hopkinson; M.I. Polkey; F.J. Wilson; W. MacNee; K.R. Westerterp; T. Troosters

doi:10.1183/09031936.00134312

Validity of physical activity monitors during daily life in patients with COPD.

R.A. Rabinovich^*, Z. Louvaris, Y. Raste, D. Langer, H.V. Remoortel, S. Giavedoni, C. Burtin, E.M. Regueiro, I. Vogiatzis, N.S. Hopkinson, M.I. Polkey, F.J. Wilson, W. MacNee, K.R. Westerterp, T. Troosters

^*Corresponding author for this work

Humane Biologie

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

73 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Symptoms during physical activity (PA) and physical inactivity are COPD. Our aim was to evaluate the validity and usability of six activity in patients with COPD against the doubly labelled water (DLW) indirect calorimetry method.Eighty COPD patients (age 68+/-6 years, FEV1 57+/-19% predicted) recruited in four centres each wore simultaneously three or six commercially available monitors validated in chronic conditions for consecutive days. A priori validity criteria were defined. These ability to explain total energy expenditure (TEE) variance through regression analysis, using TEE as the dependent variable with total body (TBW) plus several PA monitors outputs as independent variables; and with DLW measured activity energy expenditure (AEE).The Actigraph GT3X DynaPort MoveMonitor best explained the majority of the TEE variance not explained by TBW (53% and 70% respectively) and showed the most correlations with AEE (r=0.71 p<0.001, r=0.70 p<0.0001, of this study should guide users in choosing valid activity monitors for or for clinical use in patients with chronic diseases such as COPD.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1205-1215
Journal	European Respiratory Journal
Volume	42
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00134312
Publication status	Published - 1 Jan 2013

Access to Document

10.1183/09031936.00134312

Full TextFinal published version, 492 KBLicence: Taverne

Cite this

Rabinovich, R. A., Louvaris, Z., Raste, Y., Langer, D., Remoortel, H. V., Giavedoni, S., Burtin, C., Regueiro, E. M., Vogiatzis, I., Hopkinson, N. S., Polkey, M. I., Wilson, F. J., MacNee, W., Westerterp, K. R., & Troosters, T. (2013). Validity of physical activity monitors during daily life in patients with COPD. European Respiratory Journal, 42(5), 1205-1215. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00134312

@article{b75b5034500a4c949763843acea04e6e,

title = "Validity of physical activity monitors during daily life in patients with COPD.",

abstract = "Symptoms during physical activity (PA) and physical inactivity are COPD. Our aim was to evaluate the validity and usability of six activity in patients with COPD against the doubly labelled water (DLW) indirect calorimetry method.Eighty COPD patients (age 68+/-6 years, FEV1 57+/-19% predicted) recruited in four centres each wore simultaneously three or six commercially available monitors validated in chronic conditions for consecutive days. A priori validity criteria were defined. These ability to explain total energy expenditure (TEE) variance through regression analysis, using TEE as the dependent variable with total body (TBW) plus several PA monitors outputs as independent variables; and with DLW measured activity energy expenditure (AEE).The Actigraph GT3X DynaPort MoveMonitor best explained the majority of the TEE variance not explained by TBW (53% and 70% respectively) and showed the most correlations with AEE (r=0.71 p<0.001, r=0.70 p<0.0001, of this study should guide users in choosing valid activity monitors for or for clinical use in patients with chronic diseases such as COPD.",

author = "R.A. Rabinovich and Z. Louvaris and Y. Raste and D. Langer and H.V. Remoortel and S. Giavedoni and C. Burtin and E.M. Regueiro and I. Vogiatzis and N.S. Hopkinson and M.I. Polkey and F.J. Wilson and W. MacNee and K.R. Westerterp and T. Troosters",

year = "2013",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1183/09031936.00134312",

language = "English",

volume = "42",

pages = "1205--1215",

journal = "European Respiratory Journal",

issn = "0903-1936",

publisher = "European Respiratory Society",

number = "5",

}

Rabinovich, RA, Louvaris, Z, Raste, Y, Langer, D, Remoortel, HV, Giavedoni, S, Burtin, C, Regueiro, EM, Vogiatzis, I, Hopkinson, NS, Polkey, MI, Wilson, FJ, MacNee, W, Westerterp, KR & Troosters, T 2013, 'Validity of physical activity monitors during daily life in patients with COPD.', European Respiratory Journal, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 1205-1215. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00134312

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validity of physical activity monitors during daily life in patients with COPD.

AU - Rabinovich, R.A.

AU - Louvaris, Z.

AU - Raste, Y.

AU - Langer, D.

AU - Remoortel, H.V.

AU - Giavedoni, S.

AU - Burtin, C.

AU - Regueiro, E.M.

AU - Vogiatzis, I.

AU - Hopkinson, N.S.

AU - Polkey, M.I.

AU - Wilson, F.J.

AU - MacNee, W.

AU - Westerterp, K.R.

AU - Troosters, T.

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Symptoms during physical activity (PA) and physical inactivity are COPD. Our aim was to evaluate the validity and usability of six activity in patients with COPD against the doubly labelled water (DLW) indirect calorimetry method.Eighty COPD patients (age 68+/-6 years, FEV1 57+/-19% predicted) recruited in four centres each wore simultaneously three or six commercially available monitors validated in chronic conditions for consecutive days. A priori validity criteria were defined. These ability to explain total energy expenditure (TEE) variance through regression analysis, using TEE as the dependent variable with total body (TBW) plus several PA monitors outputs as independent variables; and with DLW measured activity energy expenditure (AEE).The Actigraph GT3X DynaPort MoveMonitor best explained the majority of the TEE variance not explained by TBW (53% and 70% respectively) and showed the most correlations with AEE (r=0.71 p<0.001, r=0.70 p<0.0001, of this study should guide users in choosing valid activity monitors for or for clinical use in patients with chronic diseases such as COPD.

AB - Symptoms during physical activity (PA) and physical inactivity are COPD. Our aim was to evaluate the validity and usability of six activity in patients with COPD against the doubly labelled water (DLW) indirect calorimetry method.Eighty COPD patients (age 68+/-6 years, FEV1 57+/-19% predicted) recruited in four centres each wore simultaneously three or six commercially available monitors validated in chronic conditions for consecutive days. A priori validity criteria were defined. These ability to explain total energy expenditure (TEE) variance through regression analysis, using TEE as the dependent variable with total body (TBW) plus several PA monitors outputs as independent variables; and with DLW measured activity energy expenditure (AEE).The Actigraph GT3X DynaPort MoveMonitor best explained the majority of the TEE variance not explained by TBW (53% and 70% respectively) and showed the most correlations with AEE (r=0.71 p<0.001, r=0.70 p<0.0001, of this study should guide users in choosing valid activity monitors for or for clinical use in patients with chronic diseases such as COPD.

U2 - 10.1183/09031936.00134312

DO - 10.1183/09031936.00134312

M3 - Article

SN - 0903-1936

VL - 42

SP - 1205

EP - 1215

JO - European Respiratory Journal

JF - European Respiratory Journal

IS - 5

ER -