Validity of 24-h recalls in (pre-)school aged children: Comparison of proxy-reported energy intakes with measured energy expenditure.

C. Bornhorst; S. Bel Serrat; I. Pigeot; I. Huybrechts; C. Ottavaere; I. Sioen; S. De Henauw; T. Mouratidou; M.I. Mesana; K. Westerterp; K. Bammann; L. Lissner; G. Eiben; V. Pala; M. Rayson; V. Krogh; L.A. Moreno

doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2013.03.018

Validity of 24-h recalls in (pre-)school aged children: Comparison of proxy-reported energy intakes with measured energy expenditure.

C. Bornhorst
, S. Bel Serrat
, I. Pigeot
, I. Huybrechts
, C. Ottavaere
, I. Sioen
, S. De Henauw
, T. Mouratidou
, M.I. Mesana
, K. Westerterp
, K. Bammann
, L. Lissner
, G. Eiben
, V. Pala
, M. Rayson
, V. Krogh
, L.A. Moreno^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Humane Biologie

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

163 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background & aims: Little is known about the validity of repeated 24-h dietary recalls (24-HDR) as a measure of total energy intake (El) in young children. This study aimed to evaluate the validity of proxy-reported El by comparison with total energy expenditure (TEE) measured by the doubly labeled water (DLW) technique.

Methods: The agreement between El and TEE was investigated in 36 (47.2% boys) children aged 4-10 years from Belgium and Spain using subgroup analyses and Bland-Altman plots. Low-energy-reporters (LER), adequate-energy-reporters (AER) and high-energy-reporters (HER) were defined from the ratio of El over TEE by application of age- and sex-specific cut-off values.

Results: There was good agreement between means of El (1500 kcal/day) and TEE (1523 kcal/day) at group level though in single children, i.e. at the individual level, large differences were observed. Almost perfect agreement between El and TEE was observed in thin/normal weight children (EI: 1511 kcal/day; TEE: 1513 kcal/day). Even in overweight/obese children the mean difference between El and TEE was only 86 kcal/day. Among the participants, 28(78%) were classified as AER, five (14%) as HER and three (8%) as LER.

Conclusion: Two proxy-reported 24-HDRs were found to be a valid instrument to assess El on group level but not on the individual level.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	79-84
Number of pages	6
Journal	Clinical Nutrition
Volume	33
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2013.03.018
Publication status	Published - Feb 2014

Keywords

Child
Doubly labeled water
Energy expenditure
Energy intake
DOUBLY-LABELED WATER
BODY-COMPOSITION
SUBJECT VARIATION
BETWEEN-SUBJECT
VALIDATION
ADOLESCENTS
CHILDHOOD
INFANCY
OBESITY
HUMANS

Access to Document

10.1016/j.clnu.2013.03.018

Full TextFinal published version, 302 KBLicence: Taverne

Cite this

Bornhorst, C., Bel Serrat, S., Pigeot, I., Huybrechts, I., Ottavaere, C., Sioen, I., De Henauw, S., Mouratidou, T., Mesana, M. I., Westerterp, K., Bammann, K., Lissner, L., Eiben, G., Pala, V., Rayson, M., Krogh, V., & Moreno, L. A. (2014). Validity of 24-h recalls in (pre-)school aged children: Comparison of proxy-reported energy intakes with measured energy expenditure. Clinical Nutrition, 33(1), 79-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2013.03.018

@article{54a3297c135b4474ab9f1c21b1bd7e13,

title = "Validity of 24-h recalls in (pre-)school aged children: Comparison of proxy-reported energy intakes with measured energy expenditure.",

abstract = "Background \& aims: Little is known about the validity of repeated 24-h dietary recalls (24-HDR) as a measure of total energy intake (El) in young children. This study aimed to evaluate the validity of proxy-reported El by comparison with total energy expenditure (TEE) measured by the doubly labeled water (DLW) technique.Methods: The agreement between El and TEE was investigated in 36 (47.2\% boys) children aged 4-10 years from Belgium and Spain using subgroup analyses and Bland-Altman plots. Low-energy-reporters (LER), adequate-energy-reporters (AER) and high-energy-reporters (HER) were defined from the ratio of El over TEE by application of age- and sex-specific cut-off values.Results: There was good agreement between means of El (1500 kcal/day) and TEE (1523 kcal/day) at group level though in single children, i.e. at the individual level, large differences were observed. Almost perfect agreement between El and TEE was observed in thin/normal weight children (EI: 1511 kcal/day; TEE: 1513 kcal/day). Even in overweight/obese children the mean difference between El and TEE was only 86 kcal/day. Among the participants, 28(78\%) were classified as AER, five (14\%) as HER and three (8\%) as LER.Conclusion: Two proxy-reported 24-HDRs were found to be a valid instrument to assess El on group level but not on the individual level. ",

keywords = "Child, Doubly labeled water, Energy expenditure, Energy intake, DOUBLY-LABELED WATER, BODY-COMPOSITION, SUBJECT VARIATION, BETWEEN-SUBJECT, VALIDATION, ADOLESCENTS, CHILDHOOD, INFANCY, OBESITY, HUMANS",

author = "C. Bornhorst and \{Bel Serrat\}, S. and I. Pigeot and I. Huybrechts and C. Ottavaere and I. Sioen and \{De Henauw\}, S. and T. Mouratidou and M.I. Mesana and K. Westerterp and K. Bammann and L. Lissner and G. Eiben and V. Pala and M. Rayson and V. Krogh and L.A. Moreno",

year = "2014",

month = feb,

doi = "10.1016/j.clnu.2013.03.018",

language = "English",

volume = "33",

pages = "79--84",

journal = "Clinical Nutrition",

issn = "0261-5614",

publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",

number = "1",

}

Bornhorst, C, Bel Serrat, S, Pigeot, I, Huybrechts, I, Ottavaere, C, Sioen, I, De Henauw, S, Mouratidou, T, Mesana, MI, Westerterp, K, Bammann, K, Lissner, L, Eiben, G, Pala, V, Rayson, M, Krogh, V & Moreno, LA 2014, 'Validity of 24-h recalls in (pre-)school aged children: Comparison of proxy-reported energy intakes with measured energy expenditure.', Clinical Nutrition, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 79-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2013.03.018

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validity of 24-h recalls in (pre-)school aged children: Comparison of proxy-reported energy intakes with measured energy expenditure.

AU - Bornhorst, C.

AU - Bel Serrat, S.

AU - Pigeot, I.

AU - Huybrechts, I.

AU - Ottavaere, C.

AU - Sioen, I.

AU - De Henauw, S.

AU - Mouratidou, T.

AU - Mesana, M.I.

AU - Westerterp, K.

AU - Bammann, K.

AU - Lissner, L.

AU - Eiben, G.

AU - Pala, V.

AU - Rayson, M.

AU - Krogh, V.

AU - Moreno, L.A.

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - Background & aims: Little is known about the validity of repeated 24-h dietary recalls (24-HDR) as a measure of total energy intake (El) in young children. This study aimed to evaluate the validity of proxy-reported El by comparison with total energy expenditure (TEE) measured by the doubly labeled water (DLW) technique.Methods: The agreement between El and TEE was investigated in 36 (47.2% boys) children aged 4-10 years from Belgium and Spain using subgroup analyses and Bland-Altman plots. Low-energy-reporters (LER), adequate-energy-reporters (AER) and high-energy-reporters (HER) were defined from the ratio of El over TEE by application of age- and sex-specific cut-off values.Results: There was good agreement between means of El (1500 kcal/day) and TEE (1523 kcal/day) at group level though in single children, i.e. at the individual level, large differences were observed. Almost perfect agreement between El and TEE was observed in thin/normal weight children (EI: 1511 kcal/day; TEE: 1513 kcal/day). Even in overweight/obese children the mean difference between El and TEE was only 86 kcal/day. Among the participants, 28(78%) were classified as AER, five (14%) as HER and three (8%) as LER.Conclusion: Two proxy-reported 24-HDRs were found to be a valid instrument to assess El on group level but not on the individual level.

AB - Background & aims: Little is known about the validity of repeated 24-h dietary recalls (24-HDR) as a measure of total energy intake (El) in young children. This study aimed to evaluate the validity of proxy-reported El by comparison with total energy expenditure (TEE) measured by the doubly labeled water (DLW) technique.Methods: The agreement between El and TEE was investigated in 36 (47.2% boys) children aged 4-10 years from Belgium and Spain using subgroup analyses and Bland-Altman plots. Low-energy-reporters (LER), adequate-energy-reporters (AER) and high-energy-reporters (HER) were defined from the ratio of El over TEE by application of age- and sex-specific cut-off values.Results: There was good agreement between means of El (1500 kcal/day) and TEE (1523 kcal/day) at group level though in single children, i.e. at the individual level, large differences were observed. Almost perfect agreement between El and TEE was observed in thin/normal weight children (EI: 1511 kcal/day; TEE: 1513 kcal/day). Even in overweight/obese children the mean difference between El and TEE was only 86 kcal/day. Among the participants, 28(78%) were classified as AER, five (14%) as HER and three (8%) as LER.Conclusion: Two proxy-reported 24-HDRs were found to be a valid instrument to assess El on group level but not on the individual level.

KW - Child

KW - Doubly labeled water

KW - Energy expenditure

KW - Energy intake

KW - DOUBLY-LABELED WATER

KW - BODY-COMPOSITION

KW - SUBJECT VARIATION

KW - BETWEEN-SUBJECT

KW - VALIDATION

KW - ADOLESCENTS

KW - CHILDHOOD

KW - INFANCY

KW - OBESITY

KW - HUMANS

U2 - 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.03.018

DO - 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.03.018

M3 - Article

C2 - 23622780

SN - 0261-5614

VL - 33

SP - 79

EP - 84

JO - Clinical Nutrition

JF - Clinical Nutrition

IS - 1

ER -

Validity of 24-h recalls in (pre-)school aged children: Comparison of proxy-reported energy intakes with measured energy expenditure.

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this