Using the Reality Interview improves the accuracy of the Criteria Based Content Analysis and Reality Monitoring

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Active interviewing approaches can exploit the verbal differences between truthtellers and liars, thus improving detecting deception. One such method is the Reality Interview (RI) aimed to facilitate recall from truthtellers, while increasing the difficulty for liars. This study investigated whether the RI could improve the diagnostic accuracy of the Reality Monitoring and the Criteria-Based Content Analysis. Liars and truthtellers were either asked to freely recall an event or interviewed with the RI. As hypothesized, the RI improved the discriminability of Reality Monitoring and Criteria-Based Content Analysis over Free Recall. Honest responses were longer, and the RI increased the word count difference between honest and false statements. However, after correcting for word count, results were no longer significant, showing its importance for deception detection. Nonetheless, the RI increased verbal differences between truthtellers and liars, demonstrating that using the RI with verbal credibility assessment tools is a powerful combination for investigative interviewing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1018-1031
Number of pages14
JournalApplied Cognitive Psychology
Volume33
Issue number6
Early online date18 Feb 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2019

Keywords

  • credibility assessment
  • Criteria-Based Content Analysis
  • deception detection
  • Reality Interview
  • Reality Monitoring
  • LIE-DETECTION
  • COGNITIVE INTERVIEW
  • DECEPTION
  • CREDIBILITY
  • TRUTHFUL
  • ACCOUNTS
  • CUES
  • ENHANCEMENT
  • INFORMATION
  • MEMORY

Cite this

@article{e85c33efab1045da80debf17b807fcf1,
title = "Using the Reality Interview improves the accuracy of the Criteria Based Content Analysis and Reality Monitoring",
abstract = "Active interviewing approaches can exploit the verbal differences between truthtellers and liars, thus improving detecting deception. One such method is the Reality Interview (RI) aimed to facilitate recall from truthtellers, while increasing the difficulty for liars. This study investigated whether the RI could improve the diagnostic accuracy of the Reality Monitoring and the Criteria-Based Content Analysis. Liars and truthtellers were either asked to freely recall an event or interviewed with the RI. As hypothesized, the RI improved the discriminability of Reality Monitoring and Criteria-Based Content Analysis over Free Recall. Honest responses were longer, and the RI increased the word count difference between honest and false statements. However, after correcting for word count, results were no longer significant, showing its importance for deception detection. Nonetheless, the RI increased verbal differences between truthtellers and liars, demonstrating that using the RI with verbal credibility assessment tools is a powerful combination for investigative interviewing.",
keywords = "credibility assessment, Criteria-Based Content Analysis, deception detection, Reality Interview, Reality Monitoring, LIE-DETECTION, COGNITIVE INTERVIEW, DECEPTION, CREDIBILITY, TRUTHFUL, ACCOUNTS, CUES, ENHANCEMENT, INFORMATION, MEMORY",
author = "Glynis Bogaard and K. Colwell and Samantha Crans",
note = "Data source available upon request to Samantha Crans",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1002/acp.3537",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "1018--1031",
journal = "Applied Cognitive Psychology",
issn = "0888-4080",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "6",

}

Using the Reality Interview improves the accuracy of the Criteria Based Content Analysis and Reality Monitoring. / Bogaard, Glynis; Colwell, K.; Crans, Samantha.

In: Applied Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 33, No. 6, 11.2019, p. 1018-1031.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using the Reality Interview improves the accuracy of the Criteria Based Content Analysis and Reality Monitoring

AU - Bogaard, Glynis

AU - Colwell, K.

AU - Crans, Samantha

N1 - Data source available upon request to Samantha Crans

PY - 2019/11

Y1 - 2019/11

N2 - Active interviewing approaches can exploit the verbal differences between truthtellers and liars, thus improving detecting deception. One such method is the Reality Interview (RI) aimed to facilitate recall from truthtellers, while increasing the difficulty for liars. This study investigated whether the RI could improve the diagnostic accuracy of the Reality Monitoring and the Criteria-Based Content Analysis. Liars and truthtellers were either asked to freely recall an event or interviewed with the RI. As hypothesized, the RI improved the discriminability of Reality Monitoring and Criteria-Based Content Analysis over Free Recall. Honest responses were longer, and the RI increased the word count difference between honest and false statements. However, after correcting for word count, results were no longer significant, showing its importance for deception detection. Nonetheless, the RI increased verbal differences between truthtellers and liars, demonstrating that using the RI with verbal credibility assessment tools is a powerful combination for investigative interviewing.

AB - Active interviewing approaches can exploit the verbal differences between truthtellers and liars, thus improving detecting deception. One such method is the Reality Interview (RI) aimed to facilitate recall from truthtellers, while increasing the difficulty for liars. This study investigated whether the RI could improve the diagnostic accuracy of the Reality Monitoring and the Criteria-Based Content Analysis. Liars and truthtellers were either asked to freely recall an event or interviewed with the RI. As hypothesized, the RI improved the discriminability of Reality Monitoring and Criteria-Based Content Analysis over Free Recall. Honest responses were longer, and the RI increased the word count difference between honest and false statements. However, after correcting for word count, results were no longer significant, showing its importance for deception detection. Nonetheless, the RI increased verbal differences between truthtellers and liars, demonstrating that using the RI with verbal credibility assessment tools is a powerful combination for investigative interviewing.

KW - credibility assessment

KW - Criteria-Based Content Analysis

KW - deception detection

KW - Reality Interview

KW - Reality Monitoring

KW - LIE-DETECTION

KW - COGNITIVE INTERVIEW

KW - DECEPTION

KW - CREDIBILITY

KW - TRUTHFUL

KW - ACCOUNTS

KW - CUES

KW - ENHANCEMENT

KW - INFORMATION

KW - MEMORY

U2 - 10.1002/acp.3537

DO - 10.1002/acp.3537

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 1018

EP - 1031

JO - Applied Cognitive Psychology

JF - Applied Cognitive Psychology

SN - 0888-4080

IS - 6

ER -