Abstract
Using a mock witness methodology, we investigated the predictive value of metamemory measures and objective memory tests as indicators of eyewitness free recall performance. Participants (n = 208) first completed a metamemory assessment that included assessments of self-rated memory capacity, memory development and use of strategies. In a separate session, participants watched a mock-crime video and provided a free recall account, followed by one out of four independent memory tests (i.e., free recall, cued recall, face recognition and general knowledge). Accuracy, amount of details reported, confidence and over/underconfidence in the eyewitness free recall were the main dependent variables. Results indicated three main findings: (1) subjective assessments of memory capacity were not related to eyewitness free recall performance; (2) although individual confidence and over/underconfidence was somewhat stable across different memory tests, accuracy was less stable; and (3) individuals with higher self-rated memory capacity had a slightly stronger confidence-accuracy relation in free recall. These results are discussed with respect to metamemory assessments and performance stability across memory tests of different domains.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 94-106 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Memory |
Volume | 28 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 9 Nov 2019 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2 Jan 2020 |
Keywords
- Eyewitness testimony
- metamemory
- free recall
- confidence
- memory
- CONFIDENCE-ACCURACY RELATIONSHIP
- INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES
- IDENTIFICATION ACCURACY
- LINEUP INSTRUCTIONS
- RETENTION INTERVAL
- STABILITY
- JUDGMENTS
- FEEDBACK
- TIME
- SUGGESTIBILITY