Use of inhaled and oral glucocorticoids, severity of inflammatory disease and risk of hip/femur fracture: a population-based case-control study.

Vries F de, S Pouwels, JWJ Lammers, HGM Leufkens, M Bracke, C Cooper, Staa TP van, F de Vries, J W J Lammers, H G M Leufkens, T P van Staa*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review


Background: Patients using higher dosages of inhaled or oral glucocorticoids (GCs) have an increased risk of hip/femur fractures. The role of the underlying disease in the aetiology of this increased risk has not been widely studied.Objective: To evaluate the contribution of the underlying disease to the risk of hip/femur fracture in patients using inhaled or oral GCs.Design and Subjects: A case-control study within the Dutch PHARMO-RLS database was conducted. Cases (n = 6763) were adult patients with a first hip/femur fracture during enrolment. Each case was matched to four controls by age, gender and region.Results: The risk of hip/femur fracture increased with current use of inhaled GCs (crude OR 1.30, 95% CI:1.16-1.47) and with current use of oral GCs (crude OR 1.66, 95% CI: 1.46-1.90). After adjustment for disease severity, the risk of hip/femur fracture was no longer statistically significantly increased in inhaled GC users (adjusted OR 1.08, 95% CI: 0.91-1.27), whilst it remained elevated in oral GC users (adjusted OR 1.43, 95% CI: 1.22-1.67). Patients using inhaled GCs without any exposure to oral GCs had no increased risk of fracture (adjusted OR 0.98, 95% CI: 0.79-1.22).Conclusion: Inhaled GC users had no increased risk of femur/hip fracture after adjustment for underlying disease severity. Our data suggest that, even at higher dosages, inhaled GC use is not an independent risk factor for fracture. In contrast, oral GC use was associated with an increased risk of fracture, which was not fully explained by the underlying disease severity.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)170-177
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Internal Medicine
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2007

Cite this