Urologists' Referral Attitude for Sacral Neuromodulation for Treating Refractory Idiopathic Overactive Bladder Syndrome: Discrete Choice Experiment

Thomas M. Kessler; Angelina Maric; Livio Mordasini; Jens Woellner; Juergen Pannek; Ulrich Mehnert; Philip E. van Kerrebroeck; Lucas M. Bachmann

doi:10.1002/nau.22490

Urologists' Referral Attitude for Sacral Neuromodulation for Treating Refractory Idiopathic Overactive Bladder Syndrome: Discrete Choice Experiment

Thomas M. Kessler^*, Angelina Maric, Livio Mordasini, Jens Woellner, Juergen Pannek, Ulrich Mehnert, Philip E. van Kerrebroeck, Lucas M. Bachmann

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Aims To investigate urologists' referral attitude for sacral neuromodulation (SNM) for treating refractory idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) and to quantify the weight they attribute to clinical parameters to refrain from SNM referral. MethodsWe set up a vignette study using a discrete-choice design. The questionnaires were distributed at two national urological meetings. ResultsOne hundred eight urologists completed the questionnaire. Three parameters were significantly associated with the decision to refrain from referral: absolute contraindications for SNM (anatomical low bladder compliance, current urinary tract infection, progressive neurological disease, urinary tumors) had the strongest association (0.78, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.97; P

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1240-1246
Journal	Neurourology and Urodynamics
Volume	33
Issue number	8
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22490
Publication status	Published - Nov 2014

Keywords

discrete-choice experiment
overactive bladder syndrome
sacral neuromodulation
vignette study

Access to Document

10.1002/nau.22490

Cite this

@article{f35e459d82ea41cdaa9e337e30a2b6c0,

title = "Urologists' Referral Attitude for Sacral Neuromodulation for Treating Refractory Idiopathic Overactive Bladder Syndrome: Discrete Choice Experiment",

abstract = "Aims To investigate urologists' referral attitude for sacral neuromodulation (SNM) for treating refractory idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) and to quantify the weight they attribute to clinical parameters to refrain from SNM referral. MethodsWe set up a vignette study using a discrete-choice design. The questionnaires were distributed at two national urological meetings. ResultsOne hundred eight urologists completed the questionnaire. Three parameters were significantly associated with the decision to refrain from referral: absolute contraindications for SNM (anatomical low bladder compliance, current urinary tract infection, progressive neurological disease, urinary tumors) had the strongest association (0.78, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.97; P",

keywords = "discrete-choice experiment, overactive bladder syndrome, sacral neuromodulation, vignette study",

author = "Kessler, {Thomas M.} and Angelina Maric and Livio Mordasini and Jens Woellner and Juergen Pannek and Ulrich Mehnert and {van Kerrebroeck}, {Philip E.} and Bachmann, {Lucas M.}",

year = "2014",

month = nov,

doi = "10.1002/nau.22490",

language = "English",

volume = "33",

pages = "1240--1246",

journal = "Neurourology and Urodynamics",

issn = "0733-2467",

publisher = "Wiley",

number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Urologists' Referral Attitude for Sacral Neuromodulation for Treating Refractory Idiopathic Overactive Bladder Syndrome: Discrete Choice Experiment

AU - Kessler, Thomas M.

AU - Maric, Angelina

AU - Mordasini, Livio

AU - Woellner, Jens

AU - Pannek, Juergen

AU - Mehnert, Ulrich

AU - van Kerrebroeck, Philip E.

AU - Bachmann, Lucas M.

PY - 2014/11

Y1 - 2014/11

N2 - Aims To investigate urologists' referral attitude for sacral neuromodulation (SNM) for treating refractory idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) and to quantify the weight they attribute to clinical parameters to refrain from SNM referral. MethodsWe set up a vignette study using a discrete-choice design. The questionnaires were distributed at two national urological meetings. ResultsOne hundred eight urologists completed the questionnaire. Three parameters were significantly associated with the decision to refrain from referral: absolute contraindications for SNM (anatomical low bladder compliance, current urinary tract infection, progressive neurological disease, urinary tumors) had the strongest association (0.78, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.97; P

AB - Aims To investigate urologists' referral attitude for sacral neuromodulation (SNM) for treating refractory idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) and to quantify the weight they attribute to clinical parameters to refrain from SNM referral. MethodsWe set up a vignette study using a discrete-choice design. The questionnaires were distributed at two national urological meetings. ResultsOne hundred eight urologists completed the questionnaire. Three parameters were significantly associated with the decision to refrain from referral: absolute contraindications for SNM (anatomical low bladder compliance, current urinary tract infection, progressive neurological disease, urinary tumors) had the strongest association (0.78, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.97; P

KW - discrete-choice experiment

KW - overactive bladder syndrome

KW - sacral neuromodulation

KW - vignette study

U2 - 10.1002/nau.22490

DO - 10.1002/nau.22490

M3 - Article

C2 - 24127359

SN - 0733-2467

VL - 33

SP - 1240

EP - 1246

JO - Neurourology and Urodynamics

JF - Neurourology and Urodynamics

IS - 8

ER -

Urologists' Referral Attitude for Sacral Neuromodulation for Treating Refractory Idiopathic Overactive Bladder Syndrome: Discrete Choice Experiment

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this