Urban residence and higher education do not protect against cognitive decline in aging and dementia: 10-Year follow-up of the Canadian Study of Health and Aging

Edward Helmes, Pascal W.M. van Gerven

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The construct of cognitive reserve has primarily been defined in terms of a single proxy measure, education. There may, however, be alternative, potentially additive, proxy measures of cognitive reserve, such as rural or urban residence. Using a large sample of 10,263 older Canadians, ranging in age between 64 and 99 years (mean age = 75.7 years, SD = 7.1), residents of rural and urban areas were compared using the Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) examination as a dependent variable. Within this sample, subsamples of demented and non-demented individuals were investigated. The 3MS data were analyzed using a linear mixed model with years of education and residence as proxies of cognitive reserve and time of testing (linear and quadratic) as a within-groups variable. All predictor variables in the model (i.e., gender, age, education, residence, and time of testing) had a significant impact on cognitive functioning. The results showed that, although urban residents and higher educated individuals performed better than rural residents and lower educated individuals at baseline, these performance benefits were nullified at 10-year follow-up. The disappearance of these initial performance benefits suggests that urban dwellers and higher educated individuals are not protected against age-related cognitive decline. Thus, no support was found for the cognitive reserve hypothesis.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)552-560
Number of pages9
JournalEducational Gerontology
Volume43
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Sep 2017

Cite this

@article{ce0b253383564d86a5effe6f5d8de3b0,
title = "Urban residence and higher education do not protect against cognitive decline in aging and dementia: 10-Year follow-up of the Canadian Study of Health and Aging",
abstract = "The construct of cognitive reserve has primarily been defined in terms of a single proxy measure, education. There may, however, be alternative, potentially additive, proxy measures of cognitive reserve, such as rural or urban residence. Using a large sample of 10,263 older Canadians, ranging in age between 64 and 99 years (mean age = 75.7 years, SD = 7.1), residents of rural and urban areas were compared using the Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) examination as a dependent variable. Within this sample, subsamples of demented and non-demented individuals were investigated. The 3MS data were analyzed using a linear mixed model with years of education and residence as proxies of cognitive reserve and time of testing (linear and quadratic) as a within-groups variable. All predictor variables in the model (i.e., gender, age, education, residence, and time of testing) had a significant impact on cognitive functioning. The results showed that, although urban residents and higher educated individuals performed better than rural residents and lower educated individuals at baseline, these performance benefits were nullified at 10-year follow-up. The disappearance of these initial performance benefits suggests that urban dwellers and higher educated individuals are not protected against age-related cognitive decline. Thus, no support was found for the cognitive reserve hypothesis.",
author = "Edward Helmes and {van Gerven}, {Pascal W.M.}",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1080/03601277.2017.1372951",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "552--560",
journal = "Educational Gerontology",
issn = "0360-1277",
publisher = "Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group",
number = "11",

}

Urban residence and higher education do not protect against cognitive decline in aging and dementia : 10-Year follow-up of the Canadian Study of Health and Aging. / Helmes, Edward; van Gerven, Pascal W.M.

In: Educational Gerontology, Vol. 43, No. 11, 12.09.2017, p. 552-560.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Urban residence and higher education do not protect against cognitive decline in aging and dementia

T2 - 10-Year follow-up of the Canadian Study of Health and Aging

AU - Helmes, Edward

AU - van Gerven, Pascal W.M.

PY - 2017/9/12

Y1 - 2017/9/12

N2 - The construct of cognitive reserve has primarily been defined in terms of a single proxy measure, education. There may, however, be alternative, potentially additive, proxy measures of cognitive reserve, such as rural or urban residence. Using a large sample of 10,263 older Canadians, ranging in age between 64 and 99 years (mean age = 75.7 years, SD = 7.1), residents of rural and urban areas were compared using the Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) examination as a dependent variable. Within this sample, subsamples of demented and non-demented individuals were investigated. The 3MS data were analyzed using a linear mixed model with years of education and residence as proxies of cognitive reserve and time of testing (linear and quadratic) as a within-groups variable. All predictor variables in the model (i.e., gender, age, education, residence, and time of testing) had a significant impact on cognitive functioning. The results showed that, although urban residents and higher educated individuals performed better than rural residents and lower educated individuals at baseline, these performance benefits were nullified at 10-year follow-up. The disappearance of these initial performance benefits suggests that urban dwellers and higher educated individuals are not protected against age-related cognitive decline. Thus, no support was found for the cognitive reserve hypothesis.

AB - The construct of cognitive reserve has primarily been defined in terms of a single proxy measure, education. There may, however, be alternative, potentially additive, proxy measures of cognitive reserve, such as rural or urban residence. Using a large sample of 10,263 older Canadians, ranging in age between 64 and 99 years (mean age = 75.7 years, SD = 7.1), residents of rural and urban areas were compared using the Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) examination as a dependent variable. Within this sample, subsamples of demented and non-demented individuals were investigated. The 3MS data were analyzed using a linear mixed model with years of education and residence as proxies of cognitive reserve and time of testing (linear and quadratic) as a within-groups variable. All predictor variables in the model (i.e., gender, age, education, residence, and time of testing) had a significant impact on cognitive functioning. The results showed that, although urban residents and higher educated individuals performed better than rural residents and lower educated individuals at baseline, these performance benefits were nullified at 10-year follow-up. The disappearance of these initial performance benefits suggests that urban dwellers and higher educated individuals are not protected against age-related cognitive decline. Thus, no support was found for the cognitive reserve hypothesis.

U2 - 10.1080/03601277.2017.1372951

DO - 10.1080/03601277.2017.1372951

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 552

EP - 560

JO - Educational Gerontology

JF - Educational Gerontology

SN - 0360-1277

IS - 11

ER -