Abstract
Aims: To develop a consensus on which upper limb treatment approach is appropriate for children with unilateral USCP and to formulate a practical guideline for clinical reasoning based on the
criteria of functional therapy.
Method: The FuncRehab-Cycle, coreset of tests, specific therapy components and ICF is used as a framework for clinical reasoning to enable choices for specific functional therapy approaches
in upper limb treatment.
Results: Practical guideline for clinical reasoning based on criteria of functional therapy was developed to make choices between Modified CIMT, Hybrid-CIMT, BIMT or BoNT-A and BIMT or functional bimanual strength training.
Conclusions: Consensus was reached to realize a framework for clinical reasoning as a guidance for BIMT and H-CIMT, but not for M-CIMT and treatment options prior to BIMT or H-CIMT Aims: To develop a consensus on which upper limb treatment approach is appropriate for children
with unilateral USCP and to formulate a practical guideline for clinical reasoning based on the
criteria of functional therapy.
Method: The FuncRehab-Cycle, coreset of tests, specific therapy components and ICF is used as
a framework for clinical reasoning to enable choices for specific functional therapy approaches
in upper limb treatment.
Results: Practical guideline for clinical reasoning based on criteria of functional therapy was
developed to make choices between Modified CIMT, Hybrid-CIMT, BIMT or BoNT-A and BIMT or functional bimanual strength training.
Conclusions: Consensus was reached to realize a framework for clinical reasoning as a guidance for BIMT and H-CIMT, but not for M-CIMT and treatment options prior to BIMT or H-CIMT as a very helpful decision tool in rehabilitation.
criteria of functional therapy.
Method: The FuncRehab-Cycle, coreset of tests, specific therapy components and ICF is used as a framework for clinical reasoning to enable choices for specific functional therapy approaches
in upper limb treatment.
Results: Practical guideline for clinical reasoning based on criteria of functional therapy was developed to make choices between Modified CIMT, Hybrid-CIMT, BIMT or BoNT-A and BIMT or functional bimanual strength training.
Conclusions: Consensus was reached to realize a framework for clinical reasoning as a guidance for BIMT and H-CIMT, but not for M-CIMT and treatment options prior to BIMT or H-CIMT Aims: To develop a consensus on which upper limb treatment approach is appropriate for children
with unilateral USCP and to formulate a practical guideline for clinical reasoning based on the
criteria of functional therapy.
Method: The FuncRehab-Cycle, coreset of tests, specific therapy components and ICF is used as
a framework for clinical reasoning to enable choices for specific functional therapy approaches
in upper limb treatment.
Results: Practical guideline for clinical reasoning based on criteria of functional therapy was
developed to make choices between Modified CIMT, Hybrid-CIMT, BIMT or BoNT-A and BIMT or functional bimanual strength training.
Conclusions: Consensus was reached to realize a framework for clinical reasoning as a guidance for BIMT and H-CIMT, but not for M-CIMT and treatment options prior to BIMT or H-CIMT as a very helpful decision tool in rehabilitation.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 110-122 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Current Neurobiology |
Volume | 10 |
Issue number | 2 |
Publication status | Published - 2019 |