TY - JOUR
T1 - Understanding the risk of ionizing radiation in breast imaging
T2 - Concepts and quantities, clinical importance, and future directions
AU - Di Maria, S.
AU - van Nijnatten, T. J. A.
AU - Jeukens, C. R. L. P. N.
AU - Vedantham, S.
AU - Dietzel, M.
AU - Vaz, P.
PY - 2024/12/1
Y1 - 2024/12/1
N2 - Background: Conventional mammography remains the primary imaging modality for state-of-the-art breast imaging practice and its benefit (both on diagnostic and screening) was largely reported. In mammography, the typical Mean Glandular Dose (MGD) from X-ray radiation to the breast spans, on average, from 1 to 10 mGy, depending on breast thicknesses, percentage of fibroglandular tissue, and on the examination purpose. Methods: The aim of this narrative review is to describe the extent of radiation risk in X-ray breast imaging and discuss the main steps and parameters (e.g. MGD, screening frequency and number of examination views) that may have an influence on the radiation risk assessment. Results: Even though the radiation doses used with these examinations are very low, as compared to other medical or natural radiation exposures, there is a non-negligible associated risk of radiation-induced cancer. Accurate radiation risk assessment permits to better balance the overall estimation of the benefit-to-risk ratio in X-ray breast imaging. Conclusions: It is expected that a better knowledge about radiation-induced cancer risk among population could improve the communications skills between patients and clinicians and could help to increase the awareness in women about radiation risk perception for a transparent and proper informed choice of imaging exam.
AB - Background: Conventional mammography remains the primary imaging modality for state-of-the-art breast imaging practice and its benefit (both on diagnostic and screening) was largely reported. In mammography, the typical Mean Glandular Dose (MGD) from X-ray radiation to the breast spans, on average, from 1 to 10 mGy, depending on breast thicknesses, percentage of fibroglandular tissue, and on the examination purpose. Methods: The aim of this narrative review is to describe the extent of radiation risk in X-ray breast imaging and discuss the main steps and parameters (e.g. MGD, screening frequency and number of examination views) that may have an influence on the radiation risk assessment. Results: Even though the radiation doses used with these examinations are very low, as compared to other medical or natural radiation exposures, there is a non-negligible associated risk of radiation-induced cancer. Accurate radiation risk assessment permits to better balance the overall estimation of the benefit-to-risk ratio in X-ray breast imaging. Conclusions: It is expected that a better knowledge about radiation-induced cancer risk among population could improve the communications skills between patients and clinicians and could help to increase the awareness in women about radiation risk perception for a transparent and proper informed choice of imaging exam.
KW - Mammography
KW - Low doses
KW - Radiation-induced cancer risk
KW - Absorbed dose
KW - MONTE-CARLO
KW - MAMMOGRAPHY
KW - TOMOSYNTHESIS
KW - EXPOSURE
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111784
DO - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111784
M3 - Article
SN - 0720-048X
VL - 181
JO - European Journal of Radiology
JF - European Journal of Radiology
M1 - 111784
ER -