Two randomized crossover multicenter studies investigating gastrointestinal symptoms after bread consumption in individuals with noncoeliac wheat sensitivity: do wheat species and fermentation type matter?

Marlijne C G de Graaf, Emma Timmers, Bo Bonekamp, Gonny van Rooy, Ben J M Witteman, Peter R Shewry, Alison Lovegrove, Antoine H P America, Luud J W J Gilissen, Daniel Keszthelyi, Fred J P H Brouns, Daisy M A E Jonkers*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Many individuals reduce their bread intake because they believe wheat causes their gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. Different wheat species and processing methods may affect these responses. Objectives: We investigated the effects of 6 different bread types (prepared from 3 wheat species and 2 fermentation conditions) on GI symptoms in individuals with self-reported noncoeliac wheat sensitivity (NCWS). Methods: Two parallel, randomized, double-blind, crossover, multicenter studies were conducted. NCWS individuals, in whom coeliac disease and wheat allergy were ruled out, received 5 slices of yeast fermented (YF) (study A, n = 20) or sourdough fermented (SF) (study B, n = 20) bread made of bread wheat, spelt, or emmer in a randomized order on 3 separate test days. Each test day was preceded by a run-in period of 3 d of a symptom-free diet and separated by a wash-out period of ≥7 d. GI symptoms were evaluated by change in symptom score (test day minus average of the 3-d run-in period) on a 0–100 mm visual analogue scale (ΔVAS), comparing medians using the Friedman test. Responders were defined as an increase in ΔVAS of ≥15 mm for overall GI symptoms, abdominal discomfort, abdominal pain, bloating, and/or flatulence. Results: GI symptoms did not differ significantly between breads of different grains [YF bread wheat median ΔVAS 10.4 mm (IQR 0.0–17.8 mm), spelt 4.9 mm (−7.6 to 9.4 mm), emmer 11.0 mm (0.0–21.3 mm), P = 0.267; SF bread wheat 10.5 mm (−3.1 to 31.5 mm), spelt 11.3 mm (0.0–15.3 mm), emmer 4.0 mm (−2.9 to 9.3 mm), P = 0.144]. The number of responders was also comparable for both YF (6 to wheat, 5 to spelt, and 7 to emmer, P = 0.761) and SF breads (9 to wheat, 7 to spelt, and 8 to emmer, P = 0.761). Conclusions: The majority of NCWS individuals experienced some GI symptoms for ≥1 of the breads, but on a group level, no differences were found between different grains for either YF or SF breads. Clinical Trial Registry: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04084470 (https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04084470).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)896-907
Number of pages12
JournalAmerican Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Volume119
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 17 Feb 2024

Keywords

  • Non-coeliac wheat sensitivity
  • emmer
  • gastrointestinal symptoms
  • sourdough fermented bread
  • spelt
  • wheat
  • yeast fermented bread

Cite this