Turning Groups Inside Out: A Social Network Perspective

Bart Rienties, Dirk Tempelaar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Most research related to learning in groups focuses on the unit of the group and/or its group members. However, students may benefit from crossing the boundaries of their own group, as students in different groups may provide access to new, non-redundant knowledge and opportunities for learning. Whether boundary crossing between groups is beneficial or not for learning and academic performance has received limited conceptual and empirical attention. Using SNA and SEM modelling, we contrasted pre-post network developments amongst 683 students (132 groups) across four modules at a UK business school. We examined whether it is better for students to invest in social relations in groups to learn and enhance academic performance, or if it is better to (continue to) invest in social relations outside groups. Our findings indicated that students seemed to learn more from learning relations outside their group than from their own group members. Students with more inter-group relative to intra-group learning relations performed better on module assessments and throughout the academic year than students with more intra-group learning relations. Boundary crossing and inter-group learning deserves more empirical attention and experimentation on how to balance boundary crossing and effective group learning strategies.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)550-579
Number of pages30
JournalJournal of the Learning Sciences
Volume27
Issue number4
Early online date29 Nov 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • COLLABORATIVE LEARNING-PROCESSES
  • ACADEMIC-PERFORMANCE
  • HIGHER-EDUCATION
  • DIVERSE GROUPS
  • STUDENTS
  • CONSTRUCTIVIST
  • METAANALYSIS
  • GUIDANCE
  • SCHOOL
  • WORK

Cite this

@article{5aabebfef6bf4c9c9ccddecb165267a9,
title = "Turning Groups Inside Out: A Social Network Perspective",
abstract = "Most research related to learning in groups focuses on the unit of the group and/or its group members. However, students may benefit from crossing the boundaries of their own group, as students in different groups may provide access to new, non-redundant knowledge and opportunities for learning. Whether boundary crossing between groups is beneficial or not for learning and academic performance has received limited conceptual and empirical attention. Using SNA and SEM modelling, we contrasted pre-post network developments amongst 683 students (132 groups) across four modules at a UK business school. We examined whether it is better for students to invest in social relations in groups to learn and enhance academic performance, or if it is better to (continue to) invest in social relations outside groups. Our findings indicated that students seemed to learn more from learning relations outside their group than from their own group members. Students with more inter-group relative to intra-group learning relations performed better on module assessments and throughout the academic year than students with more intra-group learning relations. Boundary crossing and inter-group learning deserves more empirical attention and experimentation on how to balance boundary crossing and effective group learning strategies.",
keywords = "COLLABORATIVE LEARNING-PROCESSES, ACADEMIC-PERFORMANCE, HIGHER-EDUCATION, DIVERSE GROUPS, STUDENTS, CONSTRUCTIVIST, METAANALYSIS, GUIDANCE, SCHOOL, WORK",
author = "Bart Rienties and Dirk Tempelaar",
note = "Self-collected primary data based on trace and survey data",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/10508406.2017.1398652",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "550--579",
journal = "Journal of the Learning Sciences",
issn = "1050-8406",
publisher = "Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group",
number = "4",

}

Turning Groups Inside Out: A Social Network Perspective. / Rienties, Bart; Tempelaar, Dirk.

In: Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 27, No. 4, 2018, p. 550-579.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Turning Groups Inside Out: A Social Network Perspective

AU - Rienties, Bart

AU - Tempelaar, Dirk

N1 - Self-collected primary data based on trace and survey data

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Most research related to learning in groups focuses on the unit of the group and/or its group members. However, students may benefit from crossing the boundaries of their own group, as students in different groups may provide access to new, non-redundant knowledge and opportunities for learning. Whether boundary crossing between groups is beneficial or not for learning and academic performance has received limited conceptual and empirical attention. Using SNA and SEM modelling, we contrasted pre-post network developments amongst 683 students (132 groups) across four modules at a UK business school. We examined whether it is better for students to invest in social relations in groups to learn and enhance academic performance, or if it is better to (continue to) invest in social relations outside groups. Our findings indicated that students seemed to learn more from learning relations outside their group than from their own group members. Students with more inter-group relative to intra-group learning relations performed better on module assessments and throughout the academic year than students with more intra-group learning relations. Boundary crossing and inter-group learning deserves more empirical attention and experimentation on how to balance boundary crossing and effective group learning strategies.

AB - Most research related to learning in groups focuses on the unit of the group and/or its group members. However, students may benefit from crossing the boundaries of their own group, as students in different groups may provide access to new, non-redundant knowledge and opportunities for learning. Whether boundary crossing between groups is beneficial or not for learning and academic performance has received limited conceptual and empirical attention. Using SNA and SEM modelling, we contrasted pre-post network developments amongst 683 students (132 groups) across four modules at a UK business school. We examined whether it is better for students to invest in social relations in groups to learn and enhance academic performance, or if it is better to (continue to) invest in social relations outside groups. Our findings indicated that students seemed to learn more from learning relations outside their group than from their own group members. Students with more inter-group relative to intra-group learning relations performed better on module assessments and throughout the academic year than students with more intra-group learning relations. Boundary crossing and inter-group learning deserves more empirical attention and experimentation on how to balance boundary crossing and effective group learning strategies.

KW - COLLABORATIVE LEARNING-PROCESSES

KW - ACADEMIC-PERFORMANCE

KW - HIGHER-EDUCATION

KW - DIVERSE GROUPS

KW - STUDENTS

KW - CONSTRUCTIVIST

KW - METAANALYSIS

KW - GUIDANCE

KW - SCHOOL

KW - WORK

U2 - 10.1080/10508406.2017.1398652

DO - 10.1080/10508406.2017.1398652

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 550

EP - 579

JO - Journal of the Learning Sciences

JF - Journal of the Learning Sciences

SN - 1050-8406

IS - 4

ER -