Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Maastricht University Home
Support & FAQ
Home
Researchers
Publications
Activities
Press/Media
Prizes
Organisations
Datasets
Projects
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
Tunnel vision and falsification in legal decision-making
Enide Maegherman
*
*
Corresponding author for this work
University College Maastricht
Maastricht Institute for Criminal Studies (MICS)
University College Maastricht
Research output
:
Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
›
Chapter
›
Academic
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Tunnel vision and falsification in legal decision-making'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Falsification
100%
Legal Decision-making
100%
Tunnel Vision
100%
Netherlands
25%
Dutch
25%
Cognitive Processes
25%
Negative Emotions
25%
Miscarriages of Justice
25%
Cognitive Dissonance
25%
Consideration of Alternatives
25%
Legal Cases
25%
Inquisitorial System
25%
Innocence
25%
Social Sciences
Legal Decision
100%
Decision Making
100%
Emotions
66%
Dutch
33%
Justice
33%
Cognition
33%
Cognitive Dissonance
33%
INIS
decision making
100%
vision
100%
legal aspects
100%
information
25%
netherlands
25%
crime
25%
Neuroscience
Decision-Making
100%
Cognitive Process
33%
Cognitive Dissonance
33%
Psychology
Decision Making
100%
Cognitive Process
33%