Treatment fidelity of a nurse-led motivational interviewing-based pre-treatment in pain rehabilitation

V.C. Mertens, L Forsberg, J. Verbunt, R.J.E.M. Smeets, M.E.J.B. Goossens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

123 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Treatment fidelity and proficiency of a nurse-led motivational interviewing (MI)-based pre-treatment and control condition was evaluated. A random sample was scored by means of the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity (MITI) scale, and a second rater was in charge. MI fidelity was satisfactory for three out of five ratings. Most mean ratings were higher in the MI-based intervention, but differences were not statistically significant. The threshold for beginning MI proficiency was only exceeded for one score and one additional measure. In general, higher levels of fidelity in the intervention condition confirmed that MI was partially applied there. Although the quality of MI delivery as well as mixed inter-rater reliabilities of the fidelity scores leaves room for improvement, robust findings between the two raters were found. These results suggest the need for rigor selection of MI counselors on beforehand, and continuous supervision. Furthermore, fidelity check in studies using MI is needed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)459-473
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
Volume43
Issue number3
Early online date22 Dec 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2016

Keywords

  • RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL
  • TREATMENT INTEGRITY CODE
  • LOW-BACK-PAIN
  • PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY
  • CLINICAL-TRIALS
  • LIFE-STYLE
  • METAANALYSIS
  • BEHAVIOR
  • RECOMMENDATIONS
  • ENHANCEMENT

Cite this

@article{441408a5cbc04aa38d3d68894c6c21e8,
title = "Treatment fidelity of a nurse-led motivational interviewing-based pre-treatment in pain rehabilitation",
abstract = "Treatment fidelity and proficiency of a nurse-led motivational interviewing (MI)-based pre-treatment and control condition was evaluated. A random sample was scored by means of the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity (MITI) scale, and a second rater was in charge. MI fidelity was satisfactory for three out of five ratings. Most mean ratings were higher in the MI-based intervention, but differences were not statistically significant. The threshold for beginning MI proficiency was only exceeded for one score and one additional measure. In general, higher levels of fidelity in the intervention condition confirmed that MI was partially applied there. Although the quality of MI delivery as well as mixed inter-rater reliabilities of the fidelity scores leaves room for improvement, robust findings between the two raters were found. These results suggest the need for rigor selection of MI counselors on beforehand, and continuous supervision. Furthermore, fidelity check in studies using MI is needed.",
keywords = "RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL, TREATMENT INTEGRITY CODE, LOW-BACK-PAIN, PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY, CLINICAL-TRIALS, LIFE-STYLE, METAANALYSIS, BEHAVIOR, RECOMMENDATIONS, ENHANCEMENT",
author = "V.C. Mertens and L Forsberg and J. Verbunt and R.J.E.M. Smeets and M.E.J.B. Goossens",
note = "Open Access",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1007/s11414-015-9485-4",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "459--473",
journal = "Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research",
issn = "1094-3412",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "3",

}

Treatment fidelity of a nurse-led motivational interviewing-based pre-treatment in pain rehabilitation. / Mertens, V.C.; Forsberg, L; Verbunt, J.; Smeets, R.J.E.M.; Goossens, M.E.J.B.

In: Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, Vol. 43, No. 3, 07.2016, p. 459-473.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Treatment fidelity of a nurse-led motivational interviewing-based pre-treatment in pain rehabilitation

AU - Mertens, V.C.

AU - Forsberg, L

AU - Verbunt, J.

AU - Smeets, R.J.E.M.

AU - Goossens, M.E.J.B.

N1 - Open Access

PY - 2016/7

Y1 - 2016/7

N2 - Treatment fidelity and proficiency of a nurse-led motivational interviewing (MI)-based pre-treatment and control condition was evaluated. A random sample was scored by means of the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity (MITI) scale, and a second rater was in charge. MI fidelity was satisfactory for three out of five ratings. Most mean ratings were higher in the MI-based intervention, but differences were not statistically significant. The threshold for beginning MI proficiency was only exceeded for one score and one additional measure. In general, higher levels of fidelity in the intervention condition confirmed that MI was partially applied there. Although the quality of MI delivery as well as mixed inter-rater reliabilities of the fidelity scores leaves room for improvement, robust findings between the two raters were found. These results suggest the need for rigor selection of MI counselors on beforehand, and continuous supervision. Furthermore, fidelity check in studies using MI is needed.

AB - Treatment fidelity and proficiency of a nurse-led motivational interviewing (MI)-based pre-treatment and control condition was evaluated. A random sample was scored by means of the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity (MITI) scale, and a second rater was in charge. MI fidelity was satisfactory for three out of five ratings. Most mean ratings were higher in the MI-based intervention, but differences were not statistically significant. The threshold for beginning MI proficiency was only exceeded for one score and one additional measure. In general, higher levels of fidelity in the intervention condition confirmed that MI was partially applied there. Although the quality of MI delivery as well as mixed inter-rater reliabilities of the fidelity scores leaves room for improvement, robust findings between the two raters were found. These results suggest the need for rigor selection of MI counselors on beforehand, and continuous supervision. Furthermore, fidelity check in studies using MI is needed.

KW - RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL

KW - TREATMENT INTEGRITY CODE

KW - LOW-BACK-PAIN

KW - PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY

KW - CLINICAL-TRIALS

KW - LIFE-STYLE

KW - METAANALYSIS

KW - BEHAVIOR

KW - RECOMMENDATIONS

KW - ENHANCEMENT

U2 - 10.1007/s11414-015-9485-4

DO - 10.1007/s11414-015-9485-4

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 459

EP - 473

JO - Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research

JF - Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research

SN - 1094-3412

IS - 3

ER -