Training robotic surgery in urology: experience and opinions of robot urologists

W. M. Brinkman; B. M. A. Schout; J. B. Rietbergen; A. H. de Vries; H. G. van der Poel; E. L. Koldewijn; J. A. Witjes; J. J. G. van Merrienboer

doi:10.1002/rcs.1631

Training robotic surgery in urology: experience and opinions of robot urologists

W. M. Brinkman^*, B. M. A. Schout, J. B. Rietbergen, A. H. de Vries, H. G. van der Poel, E. L. Koldewijn, J. A. Witjes, J. J. G. van Merrienboer

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

55 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background To answer the research questions: (a) what were the training pathways followed by the first generation of robot urologists; and (b) what are their opinions on the ideal training for the future generation? MethodsData were gathered with a questionnaire and semi-structured interviews in a mixed-method research design. ResultsThe results show that training approaches differed from hardly any formal training to complete self-initiated training programmes, with all available learning resources. The median number of supervised procedures at the start of robot-assisted laparoscopy was five (range 0-100). Before patient-related console time, respondents indicated that the minimum training of robot trainees should consist of: live observations (94% indicated this as essential), video observations (90%), knowledge (88%), table assisting (87%) and basic skills (70%). ConclusionThe first generation of robot urologists used different training approaches to start robotic surgery. There is a need for a structured and compulsory training programme for robotic surgery.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	308-318
Journal	International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery
Volume	11
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1631
Publication status	Published - Sept 2015

Keywords

robot training
expert opinion
interview

Access to Document

10.1002/rcs.1631

Full TextFinal published version, 2.04 MBLicence: Taverne

Cite this

@article{b2b9bb550fee4d48a4630822897c77cc,

title = "Training robotic surgery in urology: experience and opinions of robot urologists",

abstract = "Background To answer the research questions: (a) what were the training pathways followed by the first generation of robot urologists; and (b) what are their opinions on the ideal training for the future generation? MethodsData were gathered with a questionnaire and semi-structured interviews in a mixed-method research design. ResultsThe results show that training approaches differed from hardly any formal training to complete self-initiated training programmes, with all available learning resources. The median number of supervised procedures at the start of robot-assisted laparoscopy was five (range 0-100). Before patient-related console time, respondents indicated that the minimum training of robot trainees should consist of: live observations (94% indicated this as essential), video observations (90%), knowledge (88%), table assisting (87%) and basic skills (70%). ConclusionThe first generation of robot urologists used different training approaches to start robotic surgery. There is a need for a structured and compulsory training programme for robotic surgery. ",

keywords = "robot training, expert opinion, interview",

author = "Brinkman, {W. M.} and Schout, {B. M. A.} and Rietbergen, {J. B.} and {de Vries}, {A. H.} and {van der Poel}, {H. G.} and Koldewijn, {E. L.} and Witjes, {J. A.} and {van Merrienboer}, {J. J. G.}",

year = "2015",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1002/rcs.1631",

language = "English",

volume = "11",

pages = "308--318",

journal = "International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery",

issn = "1478-5951",

publisher = "Wiley",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Training robotic surgery in urology: experience and opinions of robot urologists

AU - Brinkman, W. M.

AU - Schout, B. M. A.

AU - Rietbergen, J. B.

AU - de Vries, A. H.

AU - van der Poel, H. G.

AU - Koldewijn, E. L.

AU - Witjes, J. A.

AU - van Merrienboer, J. J. G.

PY - 2015/9

Y1 - 2015/9

N2 - Background To answer the research questions: (a) what were the training pathways followed by the first generation of robot urologists; and (b) what are their opinions on the ideal training for the future generation? MethodsData were gathered with a questionnaire and semi-structured interviews in a mixed-method research design. ResultsThe results show that training approaches differed from hardly any formal training to complete self-initiated training programmes, with all available learning resources. The median number of supervised procedures at the start of robot-assisted laparoscopy was five (range 0-100). Before patient-related console time, respondents indicated that the minimum training of robot trainees should consist of: live observations (94% indicated this as essential), video observations (90%), knowledge (88%), table assisting (87%) and basic skills (70%). ConclusionThe first generation of robot urologists used different training approaches to start robotic surgery. There is a need for a structured and compulsory training programme for robotic surgery.

AB - Background To answer the research questions: (a) what were the training pathways followed by the first generation of robot urologists; and (b) what are their opinions on the ideal training for the future generation? MethodsData were gathered with a questionnaire and semi-structured interviews in a mixed-method research design. ResultsThe results show that training approaches differed from hardly any formal training to complete self-initiated training programmes, with all available learning resources. The median number of supervised procedures at the start of robot-assisted laparoscopy was five (range 0-100). Before patient-related console time, respondents indicated that the minimum training of robot trainees should consist of: live observations (94% indicated this as essential), video observations (90%), knowledge (88%), table assisting (87%) and basic skills (70%). ConclusionThe first generation of robot urologists used different training approaches to start robotic surgery. There is a need for a structured and compulsory training programme for robotic surgery.

KW - robot training

KW - expert opinion

KW - interview

U2 - 10.1002/rcs.1631

DO - 10.1002/rcs.1631

M3 - Article

C2 - 25346023

SN - 1478-5951

VL - 11

SP - 308

EP - 318

JO - International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

JF - International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

IS - 3

ER -