Tracking and Reporting Outcomes Of Procedural Sedation (TROOPS): Standardized Quality Improvement and Research Tools from the International Committee for the Advancement of Procedural Sedation

M. G. Roback, S. M. Green, G. Andolfatto, P. L. Leroy, K. P. Mason*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

32 Citations (Web of Science)

Abstract

Many hospitals, and medical and dental clinics and offices, routinely monitor their procedural-sedation practicesd tracking adverse events, outcomes, and efficacy in order to optimize the sedation delivery and practice. Currently, there exist substantial differences between settings in the content, collection, definition, and interpretation of such sedation outcomes, with resulting widespread reporting variation. With the objective of reducing such disparities, the International Committee for the Advancement of Procedural Sedation has herein developed a multidisciplinary, consensus-based, standardized tool intended to be applicable for all types of sedation providers in all locations worldwide. This tool is amenable for inclusion in either a paper or an electronic medical record. An additional, parallel research tool is presented to promote consistency and standardized data collection for procedural-sedation investigations.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)164-172
Number of pages9
JournalBritish Journal of Anaesthesia
Volume120
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018

Keywords

  • adverse events
  • quality improvement
  • sedation
  • EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT
  • ADVERSE EVENTS
  • CONTROLLED-TRIAL
  • CLINICAL-TRIAL
  • ANALGESIA
  • CHILDREN
  • PROPOFOL
  • KETAMINE

Cite this