Tracing controversies in hacker communities: ethical considerations for internet research

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Abstract this paper reflects on the ethics of internet research on community controversies. Specifically, it focuses on controversies concerning gendered, social interaction in hacking communities. It addresses the question how internet researchers should treat and represent content that individuals controversially discussed online. While many internet sources are likewise technically public, they may yet suggest distinct privacy expectations on the part of involved individuals. In internet research, ethical decision-making regarding which online primary sources may be, e.g., referenced and quoted or require anonymisation is still ambiguous and contested. Instead of generalisable rules, the context dependence of internet research ethics has been frequently stressed. Given this ambiguity, the paper elaborates on ethical decisions and their implications by exploring the case of a controversial hackerspaces.org mailing list debate. In tracing data across different platforms, it analyses the emerging ethico-methodological challenges.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)76-93
Number of pages18
JournalInformation, communication and society
Volume23
Issue number1
Early online date5 Jul 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2020

Keywords

  • Ethics
  • hacking
  • gender
  • geek feminism
  • internet research
  • ETHNOGRAPHY

Cite this