Three traditional and three new childhood anxiety questionnaires: their reliability and validity in a normal adolescent sample.

P.E.H.M. Muris*, H.L.G.J. Merckelbach, T. Ollendick, N. King, N P. Bogie

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1096 Downloads (Pure)


The current study examined the psychometrics of three traditional [i.e., the trait anxiety version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children (STAIC), the Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale (RCMAS), and the Fear Survey Schedule for Children - Revised (FSSC-R)] and three new childhood anxiety scales [the Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC), the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED), and the Spence Children's Anxiety Scale (SCAS)] in a large sample of normal adolescents (N=521). Childhood anxiety scales were generally found to be reliable in terms of internal consistency. Furthermore, evidence was obtained for the convergent and divergent validity of the various anxiety questionnaires. That is, anxiety questionnaire scores were found to be substantially intercorrelated. Particularly strong associations were found between total scores of the STAIC and the RCMAS, total scores of the SCARED and the SCAS, and between subscales that intend to measure specific categories of anxiety symptoms. Childhood anxiety questionnaires were substantially connected to an index of depression, although correlations among anxiety questionnaires were generally higher than those between anxiety scales and a measure of depression.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)753-772
JournalBehaviour Research and Therapy
Issue number7
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2002

Cite this