Three out of four: a case discussion on ambiguous genitalia

Edgar G A H van Mil*, Olaf Hiort

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Disorders of sex development (DSD) include a heterogeneous group of heritable disorders of sex determination and differentiation. This includes chromosomal as well as monogenic disorders, which inhibit or change primarily genetic or endocrine pathways of normal sex development. However, in many patients affected, no definitive cause for the disorder can be found. Therefore, the birth of a child with ambiguous genitalia still represents an enormous challenge. For the structuring of diagnostic procedures, decision making and also therapeutic interventions, a highly specialised team of physicians of different subspecialties and experts for psychosocial care is needed to counsel parents and patients accordingly. This article presents a case with 46,XX DSD and androgen excess. After making the diagnosis on clinical and biochemical grounds, the family refused further genetic testing. The outcome of subsequent pregnancies confirmed the working diagnosis of an autosomal form of 46,XX DSD. However, the family still refused prenatal testing and treatment on religious grounds. The case discussion further illuminates the possible influence of religion in prenatal testing and concludes with the approach to the parents for comprehensive counselling in decision making for their child.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)S91-3
JournalEuropean Journal of Endocrinology
Volume159 Suppl 1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2008
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Adrenal Hyperplasia, Congenital/complications
  • Androgens/metabolism
  • Clitoris/surgery
  • Counseling
  • Female
  • Gonadal Dysgenesis, 46,XX/etiology
  • Humans
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Karyotyping
  • Male
  • Religion
  • Treatment Refusal
  • Up-Regulation
  • Vagina/surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Three out of four: a case discussion on ambiguous genitalia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this