Abstract
The utility of gambling, which entails an intrinsic utility or disutility of risk, has been alluded to in the economics literature for over a century. This paper demonstrates that any utility of gambling almost unavoidably implies a violation of fundamental rationality properties, such as transitivity or stochastic dominance, for static choices between gambles. This result may explain why the utility of gambling, a phenomenon so widely discussed, has never been formalized in the economics literature. The model of this paper accommodates well-known deviations from expected utility, such as the allais paradox and the coexistence of gambling and insurance, while minimally deviating from expected utility.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 241-259 |
| Journal | Journal of Risk and Uncertainty |
| Volume | 29 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2004 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Utility of Gambling Reconsidered'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver