The Use of the FACE-Q Aesthetic: A Narrative Review

M.J. Ottenhof*, I.J. Veldhuizen, L.J. v Hensbergen, L.L. Blankensteijn, W. Bramer, B. vd Lei, M.M. Hoogbergen, R.R.W.J. Hulst, C.J. Sidey-Gibbons

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal(Systematic) Review article peer-review

Abstract

Introduction In the past decade there has been an increasing interest in the field of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) which are now commonly used alongside traditional outcome measures, such as morbidity and mortality. Since the FACE-Q Aesthetic development in 2010, it has been widely used in clinical practice and research, measuring the quality of life and patient satisfaction. It quantifies the impact and change across different aspects of cosmetic facial surgery and minimally invasive treatments. We review how researchers have utilized the FACE-Q Aesthetic module to date, and aim to understand better whether and how it has enhanced our understanding and practice of aesthetic facial procedures.Methods We performed a systematic search of the literature. Publications that used the FACE-Q Aesthetic module to evaluate patient outcomes were included. Publications about the development of PROMs or modifications of the FACE-Q Aesthetic, translation or validation studies of the FACE-Q Aesthetic scales, papers not published in English, reviews, comments/discussions, or letters to the editor were excluded.Results Our search produced 1189 different articles; 70 remained after applying in- and exclusion criteria. Significant findings and associations were further explored. The need for evidence-based patient-reported outcome caused a growing uptake of the FACE-Q Aesthetic in cosmetic surgery and dermatology an increasing amount of evidence concerning facelift surgery, botulinum toxin, rhinoplasty, soft tissue fillers, scar treatments, and experimental areas.Discussion The FACE-Q Aesthetic has been used to contribute substantial evidence about the outcome from the patient perspective in cosmetic facial surgery and minimally invasive treatments. The FACE-Q Aesthetic holds great potential to improve quality of care and may fundamentally change the way we measure success in plastic surgery and dermatology.Level of Evidence III This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2769–2780
Number of pages12
JournalAesthetic Plastic Surgery
Volume46
Issue number6
Early online date28 Jun 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2022

Keywords

  • ACID
  • EFFICACY
  • FACIAL APPEARANCE
  • FILLER
  • ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY
  • PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES
  • PATIENTS SATISFACTION
  • QUALITY-OF-LIFE
  • REJUVENATION
  • RHINOPLASTY

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Use of the FACE-Q Aesthetic: A Narrative Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this