Abstract
The article analyses the strategic use of the reference to its case law by the Court of Justice as a tool to innovate EU law. It compares such use in two areas of EU law, both recently at the heart of a number of important cases: on the one hand, the European Arrest Warrant (eaw), particularly the balance between national judges’ powers to refuse the execution of the eaw and the principle of mutual trust; on the other, the recent developments in the case law concerning judicial independence in the context of the worsening rule of law backsliding in Poland. It shows that, while in both cases the Court makes consistently relies upon its ‘settled case law’, it does so in different ways. Specifically, in the case of judicial independence, the Court refers to its previous case law to expand and consolidate the power of EU institutions vis-à-vis Member States’ national autonomy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 390-414 |
| Journal | The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 16 Dec 2022 |
Keywords
- interpretative techniques
- settled case law
- rule of law report
- judicial independence
- European Arrest Warrant
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Use of Judicial Precedent as a Form of Activism by the Court of Justice: Strengthening the Union’s Powers to Protect the Rule of Law'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver