TY - JOUR
T1 - The TRENDY multi-center randomized trial on hepatocellular carcinoma - Trial QA including automated treatment planning and benchmark-case results
AU - Habraken, Steven J. M.
AU - Sharfo, Abdul Wahab M.
AU - Buijsen, Jeroen
AU - Verbakel, Wilko F. A. R.
AU - Haasbeek, Cornelis J. A.
AU - Ollers, Michel C.
AU - Westerveld, Henrike
AU - van Wieringen, Niek
AU - Reerink, Onne
AU - Seravalli, Enrica
AU - Braam, Petra M.
AU - Wendling, Markus
AU - Lacornerie, Thomas
AU - Mirabel, Xavier
AU - Weytjens, Reinhilde
AU - Depuydt, Lieselotte
AU - Tanadini-Lang, Stephanie
AU - Riesterer, Oliver
AU - Haustermans, Karin
AU - Depuydt, Tom
AU - Dwarkasing, Roy S.
AU - Willemssen, Francois E. J. A.
AU - Heijmen, Ben J. M.
AU - Romero, Alejandra Mendez
PY - 2017/12
Y1 - 2017/12
N2 - Background and purpose: The TRENDY trial is an international multi-center phase-II study, randomizing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients between transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with a target dose of 48-54 Gy in six fractions. The radiotherapy quality assurance (QA) program, including prospective plan feedback based on automated treatment planning, is described and results are reported.Materials and methods: Scans of a single patient were used as a benchmark case. Contours submitted by nine participating centers were compared with reference contours. The subsequent planning round was based on a single set of contours. A total of 20 plans from participating centers, including 12 from the benchmark case, 5 from a clinical pilot and 3 from the first study patients, were compared to automatically generated VMAT plans.Results: For the submitted liver contours, Dice Similarity Coefficients (DSC) with the reference delineation ranged from 0.925 to 0.954. For the GTV, the DSC varied between 0.721 and 0.876. For the 12 plans on the benchmark case, healthy liver normal-tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) ranged from 0.2% to 22.2% with little correlation between NCTP and PTV-D95% (R-2 <0.3). Four protocol deviations were detected in the set of 20 treatment plans. Comparison with co-planar autoVMAT QA plans revealed these were due to too high target dose and suboptimal planning. Overall, autoVMAT resulted in an average liver NTCP reduction of 2.2 percent point (range: 16.2 percent point to -1.8 percent point, p = 0.03), and lower doses to the healthy liver (p <0.01) and gastrointestinal organs at risk (p <0.001).Conclusions: Delineation variation resulted in feedback to participating centers. Automated treatment planning can play an important role in clinical trials for prospective plan QA as suboptimal plans were detected. (c) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
AB - Background and purpose: The TRENDY trial is an international multi-center phase-II study, randomizing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients between transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with a target dose of 48-54 Gy in six fractions. The radiotherapy quality assurance (QA) program, including prospective plan feedback based on automated treatment planning, is described and results are reported.Materials and methods: Scans of a single patient were used as a benchmark case. Contours submitted by nine participating centers were compared with reference contours. The subsequent planning round was based on a single set of contours. A total of 20 plans from participating centers, including 12 from the benchmark case, 5 from a clinical pilot and 3 from the first study patients, were compared to automatically generated VMAT plans.Results: For the submitted liver contours, Dice Similarity Coefficients (DSC) with the reference delineation ranged from 0.925 to 0.954. For the GTV, the DSC varied between 0.721 and 0.876. For the 12 plans on the benchmark case, healthy liver normal-tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) ranged from 0.2% to 22.2% with little correlation between NCTP and PTV-D95% (R-2 <0.3). Four protocol deviations were detected in the set of 20 treatment plans. Comparison with co-planar autoVMAT QA plans revealed these were due to too high target dose and suboptimal planning. Overall, autoVMAT resulted in an average liver NTCP reduction of 2.2 percent point (range: 16.2 percent point to -1.8 percent point, p = 0.03), and lower doses to the healthy liver (p <0.01) and gastrointestinal organs at risk (p <0.001).Conclusions: Delineation variation resulted in feedback to participating centers. Automated treatment planning can play an important role in clinical trials for prospective plan QA as suboptimal plans were detected. (c) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
KW - QA in clinical trials
KW - Benchmark-case delineation
KW - Benchmark-case treatment planning
KW - Automated treatment planning for plan QA
KW - ONCOLOGY GROUP CONSENSUS
KW - THERAPY CLINICAL-TRIALS
KW - RADIATION-THERAPY
KW - QUALITY-ASSURANCE
KW - INTEROBSERVER VARIABILITY
KW - RADIOTHERAPY
KW - GUIDELINES
KW - OUTCOMES
KW - MODEL
U2 - 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.09.007
DO - 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.09.007
M3 - Article
C2 - 29050954
SN - 0167-8140
VL - 125
SP - 507
EP - 513
JO - Radiotherapy and Oncology
JF - Radiotherapy and Oncology
IS - 3
ER -