The trauma model of dissociation: inconvenient truths and stubborn fictions. Comment on Dalenberg et al. (2012)

S.J. Lynn, S.O. Lilienfeld, H. Merckelbach, T. Giesbrecht, R.J. McNally, E.F. Loftus, M. Bruck, M. Garry, A. Malaktaris

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialAcademicpeer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Dalenberg et al. (2012) argued that convincing evidence (a) supports the longstanding trauma model (TM), which posits that early trauma plays a key role in the genesis of dissociation; and (b) refutes the fantasy model (FM), which posits that fantasy proneness, suggestibility, cognitive failures, and other variables foster dissociation. We review evidence bearing on Dalenberg et al.'s 8 predictions and find them largely wanting in empirical support. We contend that the authors repeat errors committed by many previous proponents of the TM, such as attributing a central etiological role to trauma in the absence of sufficient evidence. Specifically, Dalenberg et al. leap too quickly from correlational data to causal conclusions, do not adequately consider the lack of corroboration of abuse in many studies, and underestimate the relation between dissociation and false memories. Nevertheless, we identify points of agreement between the TM and FM regarding potential moderators and mediators of dissociative symptoms (e.g., family environment, biological vulnerabilities) and the hypothesis that dissociative identity disorder is a disorder of self-understanding. We acknowledge that trauma may play a causal role in dissociation but that this role is less central and specific than Dalenberg et al. contend. Finally, although a key assumption of the TM is dissociative amnesia, the notion that people can encode traumatic experiences without being able to recall them lacks strong empirical support. Accordingly, we conclude that the field should now abandon the simple trauma-dissociation model and embrace multifactorial models that accommodate the diversity of causes of dissociation and dissociative disorders. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)896-910
Number of pages15
JournalPsychological Bulletin
Volume140
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2014

Keywords

  • dissociation
  • dissociative disorder
  • dissociative identity disorder
  • trauma
  • sociocognitive model
  • POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER
  • REPORTING RECOVERED MEMORIES
  • CHILDHOOD SEXUAL-ABUSE
  • FANTASY PRONENESS
  • INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES
  • COGNITIVE-PROCESSES
  • FALSE MEMORIES
  • MULTIPLE PERSONALITY
  • EXPERIENCES SCALE
  • IDENTITY DISORDER

Cite this

Lynn, S. J., Lilienfeld, S. O., Merckelbach, H., Giesbrecht, T., McNally, R. J., Loftus, E. F., ... Malaktaris, A. (2014). The trauma model of dissociation: inconvenient truths and stubborn fictions. Comment on Dalenberg et al. (2012). Psychological Bulletin, 140(3), 896-910. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035570
Lynn, S.J. ; Lilienfeld, S.O. ; Merckelbach, H. ; Giesbrecht, T. ; McNally, R.J. ; Loftus, E.F. ; Bruck, M. ; Garry, M. ; Malaktaris, A. / The trauma model of dissociation: inconvenient truths and stubborn fictions. Comment on Dalenberg et al. (2012). In: Psychological Bulletin. 2014 ; Vol. 140, No. 3. pp. 896-910.
@article{6873724cc6814f6b94dd4b7e42a04ee5,
title = "The trauma model of dissociation: inconvenient truths and stubborn fictions. Comment on Dalenberg et al. (2012)",
abstract = "Dalenberg et al. (2012) argued that convincing evidence (a) supports the longstanding trauma model (TM), which posits that early trauma plays a key role in the genesis of dissociation; and (b) refutes the fantasy model (FM), which posits that fantasy proneness, suggestibility, cognitive failures, and other variables foster dissociation. We review evidence bearing on Dalenberg et al.'s 8 predictions and find them largely wanting in empirical support. We contend that the authors repeat errors committed by many previous proponents of the TM, such as attributing a central etiological role to trauma in the absence of sufficient evidence. Specifically, Dalenberg et al. leap too quickly from correlational data to causal conclusions, do not adequately consider the lack of corroboration of abuse in many studies, and underestimate the relation between dissociation and false memories. Nevertheless, we identify points of agreement between the TM and FM regarding potential moderators and mediators of dissociative symptoms (e.g., family environment, biological vulnerabilities) and the hypothesis that dissociative identity disorder is a disorder of self-understanding. We acknowledge that trauma may play a causal role in dissociation but that this role is less central and specific than Dalenberg et al. contend. Finally, although a key assumption of the TM is dissociative amnesia, the notion that people can encode traumatic experiences without being able to recall them lacks strong empirical support. Accordingly, we conclude that the field should now abandon the simple trauma-dissociation model and embrace multifactorial models that accommodate the diversity of causes of dissociation and dissociative disorders. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved).",
keywords = "dissociation, dissociative disorder, dissociative identity disorder, trauma, sociocognitive model, POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER, REPORTING RECOVERED MEMORIES, CHILDHOOD SEXUAL-ABUSE, FANTASY PRONENESS, INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES, COGNITIVE-PROCESSES, FALSE MEMORIES, MULTIPLE PERSONALITY, EXPERIENCES SCALE, IDENTITY DISORDER",
author = "S.J. Lynn and S.O. Lilienfeld and H. Merckelbach and T. Giesbrecht and R.J. McNally and E.F. Loftus and M. Bruck and M. Garry and A. Malaktaris",
year = "2014",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1037/a0035570",
language = "English",
volume = "140",
pages = "896--910",
journal = "Psychological Bulletin",
issn = "0033-2909",
publisher = "American Psychological Association",
number = "3",

}

Lynn, SJ, Lilienfeld, SO, Merckelbach, H, Giesbrecht, T, McNally, RJ, Loftus, EF, Bruck, M, Garry, M & Malaktaris, A 2014, 'The trauma model of dissociation: inconvenient truths and stubborn fictions. Comment on Dalenberg et al. (2012)', Psychological Bulletin, vol. 140, no. 3, pp. 896-910. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035570

The trauma model of dissociation: inconvenient truths and stubborn fictions. Comment on Dalenberg et al. (2012). / Lynn, S.J.; Lilienfeld, S.O.; Merckelbach, H.; Giesbrecht, T.; McNally, R.J.; Loftus, E.F.; Bruck, M.; Garry, M.; Malaktaris, A.

In: Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 140, No. 3, 05.2014, p. 896-910.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The trauma model of dissociation: inconvenient truths and stubborn fictions. Comment on Dalenberg et al. (2012)

AU - Lynn, S.J.

AU - Lilienfeld, S.O.

AU - Merckelbach, H.

AU - Giesbrecht, T.

AU - McNally, R.J.

AU - Loftus, E.F.

AU - Bruck, M.

AU - Garry, M.

AU - Malaktaris, A.

PY - 2014/5

Y1 - 2014/5

N2 - Dalenberg et al. (2012) argued that convincing evidence (a) supports the longstanding trauma model (TM), which posits that early trauma plays a key role in the genesis of dissociation; and (b) refutes the fantasy model (FM), which posits that fantasy proneness, suggestibility, cognitive failures, and other variables foster dissociation. We review evidence bearing on Dalenberg et al.'s 8 predictions and find them largely wanting in empirical support. We contend that the authors repeat errors committed by many previous proponents of the TM, such as attributing a central etiological role to trauma in the absence of sufficient evidence. Specifically, Dalenberg et al. leap too quickly from correlational data to causal conclusions, do not adequately consider the lack of corroboration of abuse in many studies, and underestimate the relation between dissociation and false memories. Nevertheless, we identify points of agreement between the TM and FM regarding potential moderators and mediators of dissociative symptoms (e.g., family environment, biological vulnerabilities) and the hypothesis that dissociative identity disorder is a disorder of self-understanding. We acknowledge that trauma may play a causal role in dissociation but that this role is less central and specific than Dalenberg et al. contend. Finally, although a key assumption of the TM is dissociative amnesia, the notion that people can encode traumatic experiences without being able to recall them lacks strong empirical support. Accordingly, we conclude that the field should now abandon the simple trauma-dissociation model and embrace multifactorial models that accommodate the diversity of causes of dissociation and dissociative disorders. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved).

AB - Dalenberg et al. (2012) argued that convincing evidence (a) supports the longstanding trauma model (TM), which posits that early trauma plays a key role in the genesis of dissociation; and (b) refutes the fantasy model (FM), which posits that fantasy proneness, suggestibility, cognitive failures, and other variables foster dissociation. We review evidence bearing on Dalenberg et al.'s 8 predictions and find them largely wanting in empirical support. We contend that the authors repeat errors committed by many previous proponents of the TM, such as attributing a central etiological role to trauma in the absence of sufficient evidence. Specifically, Dalenberg et al. leap too quickly from correlational data to causal conclusions, do not adequately consider the lack of corroboration of abuse in many studies, and underestimate the relation between dissociation and false memories. Nevertheless, we identify points of agreement between the TM and FM regarding potential moderators and mediators of dissociative symptoms (e.g., family environment, biological vulnerabilities) and the hypothesis that dissociative identity disorder is a disorder of self-understanding. We acknowledge that trauma may play a causal role in dissociation but that this role is less central and specific than Dalenberg et al. contend. Finally, although a key assumption of the TM is dissociative amnesia, the notion that people can encode traumatic experiences without being able to recall them lacks strong empirical support. Accordingly, we conclude that the field should now abandon the simple trauma-dissociation model and embrace multifactorial models that accommodate the diversity of causes of dissociation and dissociative disorders. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved).

KW - dissociation

KW - dissociative disorder

KW - dissociative identity disorder

KW - trauma

KW - sociocognitive model

KW - POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER

KW - REPORTING RECOVERED MEMORIES

KW - CHILDHOOD SEXUAL-ABUSE

KW - FANTASY PRONENESS

KW - INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES

KW - COGNITIVE-PROCESSES

KW - FALSE MEMORIES

KW - MULTIPLE PERSONALITY

KW - EXPERIENCES SCALE

KW - IDENTITY DISORDER

U2 - 10.1037/a0035570

DO - 10.1037/a0035570

M3 - Editorial

VL - 140

SP - 896

EP - 910

JO - Psychological Bulletin

JF - Psychological Bulletin

SN - 0033-2909

IS - 3

ER -