## Abstract

In the secretary problem we are faced with an online sequence of elements with values. Upon seeing an element we have to make an irrevocable take-it-or-leave-it decision. The goal is to maximize the probability of picking the element of maximum value. The most classic version of the problem is that in which the elements arrive in random order and their values are arbitrary. Here, the optimal algorithm picks the maximum value with probability at least 1/e. However, by varying the available information, new interesting problems arise. For instance, in the full information variant of the secretary problem the values are i.i.d. samples from a known distribution. Naturally, the best possible success probability increases and turns out to be approximately 0.58. Also, the case in which the arrival order is adversarial instead of random leads to interesting variants that have been considered in the literature.

In this paper we study both the random order and adversarial order secretary problems with an additional twist. The values are arbitrary, but before starting the online sequence we independently sample each element with a fixed probability p. The sampled elements become our information or history set and the game is played over the remaining elements. We call these problems the random order secretary problem with p-sampling (ROSp for short) and the adversarial order secretary problem with p-sampling (AOSp for short). Our main result is to obtain best possible algorithms for both problems and all values of p. As p grows to 1 the obtained guarantees converge to the optimal guarantees in the full information case. In the adversarial order setting, the best possible algorithm turns out to be a simple fixed threshold algorithm in which the optimal threshold is a function of p only. Therefore, even knowledge of the total number of elements is unnecessary. Proving that this algorithm is optimal involves a novel technique, which boils down to analyzing a related game in a conflict graph over binary sequences. In the random order setting we prove that the best possible algorithm is characterized by a fixed sequence of time thresholds, dictating at which point in time we should start accepting a value that is both a maximum of the online sequence and has a given ranking within the sampled elements. Surprisingly, this sequence of time thresholds arises from a separable and convex optimization problem whose solution is independent of p.

In this paper we study both the random order and adversarial order secretary problems with an additional twist. The values are arbitrary, but before starting the online sequence we independently sample each element with a fixed probability p. The sampled elements become our information or history set and the game is played over the remaining elements. We call these problems the random order secretary problem with p-sampling (ROSp for short) and the adversarial order secretary problem with p-sampling (AOSp for short). Our main result is to obtain best possible algorithms for both problems and all values of p. As p grows to 1 the obtained guarantees converge to the optimal guarantees in the full information case. In the adversarial order setting, the best possible algorithm turns out to be a simple fixed threshold algorithm in which the optimal threshold is a function of p only. Therefore, even knowledge of the total number of elements is unnecessary. Proving that this algorithm is optimal involves a novel technique, which boils down to analyzing a related game in a conflict graph over binary sequences. In the random order setting we prove that the best possible algorithm is characterized by a fixed sequence of time thresholds, dictating at which point in time we should start accepting a value that is both a maximum of the online sequence and has a given ranking within the sampled elements. Surprisingly, this sequence of time thresholds arises from a separable and convex optimization problem whose solution is independent of p.

Original language | English |
---|---|

Publisher | arXiv.org at Cornell University Library |

Number of pages | 41 |

Publication status | Published - 16 Nov 2020 |