The scope of school autonomy in practice: An empirically based classification of school interventions

Annemarie Neeleman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In many countries, education systems are moving towards a combination of increased school autonomy and intensified accountability. In the wake of that shift, decision-making at the school level has become paramount, and the role of the school leader has gained in importance. Despite these trends, surprisingly little is known about how schools and school leaders use school autonomy in practice. To study the use of school autonomy in practice internationally, and, subsequently, its impact on outcomes, a classification is needed to capture the full range of school interventions. An extensive literature review revealed that existing classifications are inadequate for these purposes. This article presents the mixed-methods construction and validation of an empirically based classification of school interventions that allows for the identification, analysis, and comparison of the actual use of school autonomy. To capture the range of school autonomy in practice, a school intervention was broadly defined as a planned action intended to cause change in the school. That definition was not confined to innovative interventions and did not rule out any school decision-making areas. An open-response questionnaire was employed for the same purpose. Because of the high level of school autonomy in the Dutch education system, the study was carried out among secondary-education school leaders in the Netherlands. School leaders with the ultimate process responsibility for their school were regarded as decision-making executives at the school level. To ensure the face and content validation of the classification, school-level decision-making representatives were actively involved at all stages of the process.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)31–55
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Educational Change
Volume20
Issue number1
Early online date2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2019

Keywords

  • School autonomy
  • School interventions
  • Decision-making
  • Classification
  • School change
  • School leaders
  • PRINCIPALS TIME USE
  • EDUCATIONAL-EFFECTIVENESS
  • STUDENT OUTCOMES
  • LEADERSHIP
  • IMPROVEMENT
  • STATE
  • IMPACT
  • ACHIEVEMENT
  • CHARTER
  • MODELS

Cite this

@article{a1ee46d189484b99bbdc23af60e97ebc,
title = "The scope of school autonomy in practice: An empirically based classification of school interventions",
abstract = "In many countries, education systems are moving towards a combination of increased school autonomy and intensified accountability. In the wake of that shift, decision-making at the school level has become paramount, and the role of the school leader has gained in importance. Despite these trends, surprisingly little is known about how schools and school leaders use school autonomy in practice. To study the use of school autonomy in practice internationally, and, subsequently, its impact on outcomes, a classification is needed to capture the full range of school interventions. An extensive literature review revealed that existing classifications are inadequate for these purposes. This article presents the mixed-methods construction and validation of an empirically based classification of school interventions that allows for the identification, analysis, and comparison of the actual use of school autonomy. To capture the range of school autonomy in practice, a school intervention was broadly defined as a planned action intended to cause change in the school. That definition was not confined to innovative interventions and did not rule out any school decision-making areas. An open-response questionnaire was employed for the same purpose. Because of the high level of school autonomy in the Dutch education system, the study was carried out among secondary-education school leaders in the Netherlands. School leaders with the ultimate process responsibility for their school were regarded as decision-making executives at the school level. To ensure the face and content validation of the classification, school-level decision-making representatives were actively involved at all stages of the process.",
keywords = "School autonomy, School interventions, Decision-making, Classification, School change, School leaders, PRINCIPALS TIME USE, EDUCATIONAL-EFFECTIVENESS, STUDENT OUTCOMES, LEADERSHIP, IMPROVEMENT, STATE, IMPACT, ACHIEVEMENT, CHARTER, MODELS",
author = "Annemarie Neeleman",
note = "Data Source: -",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1007/s10833-018-9332-5",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "31–55",
journal = "Journal of Educational Change",
issn = "1389-2843",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "1",

}

The scope of school autonomy in practice: An empirically based classification of school interventions. / Neeleman, Annemarie.

In: Journal of Educational Change, Vol. 20, No. 1, 02.2019, p. 31–55.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The scope of school autonomy in practice: An empirically based classification of school interventions

AU - Neeleman, Annemarie

N1 - Data Source: -

PY - 2019/2

Y1 - 2019/2

N2 - In many countries, education systems are moving towards a combination of increased school autonomy and intensified accountability. In the wake of that shift, decision-making at the school level has become paramount, and the role of the school leader has gained in importance. Despite these trends, surprisingly little is known about how schools and school leaders use school autonomy in practice. To study the use of school autonomy in practice internationally, and, subsequently, its impact on outcomes, a classification is needed to capture the full range of school interventions. An extensive literature review revealed that existing classifications are inadequate for these purposes. This article presents the mixed-methods construction and validation of an empirically based classification of school interventions that allows for the identification, analysis, and comparison of the actual use of school autonomy. To capture the range of school autonomy in practice, a school intervention was broadly defined as a planned action intended to cause change in the school. That definition was not confined to innovative interventions and did not rule out any school decision-making areas. An open-response questionnaire was employed for the same purpose. Because of the high level of school autonomy in the Dutch education system, the study was carried out among secondary-education school leaders in the Netherlands. School leaders with the ultimate process responsibility for their school were regarded as decision-making executives at the school level. To ensure the face and content validation of the classification, school-level decision-making representatives were actively involved at all stages of the process.

AB - In many countries, education systems are moving towards a combination of increased school autonomy and intensified accountability. In the wake of that shift, decision-making at the school level has become paramount, and the role of the school leader has gained in importance. Despite these trends, surprisingly little is known about how schools and school leaders use school autonomy in practice. To study the use of school autonomy in practice internationally, and, subsequently, its impact on outcomes, a classification is needed to capture the full range of school interventions. An extensive literature review revealed that existing classifications are inadequate for these purposes. This article presents the mixed-methods construction and validation of an empirically based classification of school interventions that allows for the identification, analysis, and comparison of the actual use of school autonomy. To capture the range of school autonomy in practice, a school intervention was broadly defined as a planned action intended to cause change in the school. That definition was not confined to innovative interventions and did not rule out any school decision-making areas. An open-response questionnaire was employed for the same purpose. Because of the high level of school autonomy in the Dutch education system, the study was carried out among secondary-education school leaders in the Netherlands. School leaders with the ultimate process responsibility for their school were regarded as decision-making executives at the school level. To ensure the face and content validation of the classification, school-level decision-making representatives were actively involved at all stages of the process.

KW - School autonomy

KW - School interventions

KW - Decision-making

KW - Classification

KW - School change

KW - School leaders

KW - PRINCIPALS TIME USE

KW - EDUCATIONAL-EFFECTIVENESS

KW - STUDENT OUTCOMES

KW - LEADERSHIP

KW - IMPROVEMENT

KW - STATE

KW - IMPACT

KW - ACHIEVEMENT

KW - CHARTER

KW - MODELS

U2 - 10.1007/s10833-018-9332-5

DO - 10.1007/s10833-018-9332-5

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 31

EP - 55

JO - Journal of Educational Change

JF - Journal of Educational Change

SN - 1389-2843

IS - 1

ER -