The scientific value of tractography: accuracy vs usefulness

Francois Rheault*, Helen Mayberg, Michel Thiebaut de Schotten, Alard Roebroeck, Stephanie J. Forkel

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Tractography has emerged as a central tool for mapping the cerebral white matter architecture. However, its scientific value continues to be a subject of debate, given its inherent limitations in anatomical accuracy. This concise communication showcases key points of a debate held at the 2024 Tract-Anat Retreat, addressing the trade-offs between the accuracy and utility of tractography. While tractography remains constrained by limitations related to resolution, sensitivity, and validation, its usefulness and utility in areas such as surgical planning, disorder prediction, and the elucidation of brain development are emphasized. These perspectives highlight the necessity of context-specific interpretation, anatomically informed algorithms, and the continuous refinement of tractography workflows to achieve an optimal balance between accuracy and utility.
Original languageEnglish
Article number59
Number of pages5
JournalBrain Structure & Function
Volume230
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Apr 2025

Keywords

  • DIFFUSION MRI
  • HUMAN BRAIN
  • CONNECTIONS
  • VARIABILITY
  • VALIDATION

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The scientific value of tractography: accuracy vs usefulness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this