Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The role of the courts in the field of climate change in China: an analysis of regulatory and judicial approaches

  • Xiaoli Xu

Research output: ThesisDoctoral ThesisInternal

30 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This thesis examines how China uses law to address climate change and what role courts play in this process. It first analyses China’s regulatory framework for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, including measures such as the emissions trading system, renewable energy development, and carbon offset mechanisms. The study identifies certain gaps within the existing legal framework.
It then explores how Chinese courts address climate-related disputes under current laws. The analysis distinguishes between “narrow” climate cases, which directly concern climate change, and “broad” cases, where climate goals influence judicial reasoning more indirectly. The research finds no single pattern in the narrow cases. While some courts have explicitly incorporated climate change mitigation into their reasoning, others approach such issues more cautiously. In broad cases, Chinese courts tend to support the implementation of national climate policies through statutory interpretation and developments in forms of liability, but they remain careful not to exceed their judicial role.
The thesis concludes that courts in China play a facilitative yet restrained role in climate governance.
Original languageEnglish
QualificationDoctor of Philosophy
Awarding Institution
  • Maastricht University
Supervisors/Advisors
  • Peeters, Marjan, Supervisor
  • Philipsen, Niels, Supervisor
Award date23 Mar 2026
Place of PublicationMaastricht
Publisher
Print ISBNs9789465342160
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Mar 2026

Keywords

  • Climate change litigation
  • Environmental law
  • Environmental public interest litigation
  • Chinese judicial practice

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The role of the courts in the field of climate change in China: an analysis of regulatory and judicial approaches'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this