Abstract
Students' evaluations are used to measure teaching effectiveness of staff. As such they are used to assess and appraise staff. The article - taking a doctrinal rather than an educational science approach - shows that there are considerable problems with the hypothesis that students' evaluations measure teaching effectiveness. This is even more so in systems where an overarching teaching philosophy like problem-based learning (PBL) is applied. The article identifies a working hypothesis that students do not use the teaching philosophy as primary motivator to evaluate staff, leading to a perverted incentive. Changes made to the system of evaluation in the law faculty of Maastricht University are described.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 43-54 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Law Teacher |
Volume | 54 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Mar 2020 |
Keywords
- Student
- evaluations
- problem-based learning (PBL)
- VALIDITY