The role of motivation to avoid detection in reaction time-based concealed information detection

B. Kleinberg, B. Verschuere*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Do motivated liars lie more successfully? The motivational effort hypothesis predicts that higher motivation effectively diminishes the chance of being detected, whereas the motivational impairment hypothesis predicts that the higher the motivation to go undetected, the greater the chance of being detected. We manipulated motivation in two online reaction time-based Concealed Information Test studies in which participants tried to hide their identity. Detection of concealed identity information in Experiment 1 (n = 259) was successful and a small financial incentive to avoid detection did not impact upon validity. Despite a greater financial incentive and a manipulation check showing that motivation was increased, Experiment 2 (n = 233) did not impact upon the test's validity either. A financial incentive to avoid detection did not decrease the validity of concealed information detection. (C) 2015 Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)43-51
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2016

Keywords

  • Memory detection
  • Reaction times
  • Lie detection
  • Concealed Information Test
  • Polygraph
  • Deception
  • GUILTY KNOWLEDGE TEST
  • LIE-DETECTION
  • PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL DETECTION
  • SKIN-CONDUCTANCE
  • MEMORY DETECTION
  • LOSS AVERSION
  • DECEPTION
  • EFFICIENCY
  • VALIDITY
  • CURVES

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The role of motivation to avoid detection in reaction time-based concealed information detection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this