The Role of "Interoceptive" Fear Conditioning in the Development of Panic Disorder

Klara De Cort*, Eric Griez, Marjolein Buchler, Koen Schruers

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review


More than 20% of the general population experience a panic attack at least once in their lives; however, only a minority goes on to develop panic disorder (PD). Conditioning mechanisms have been proposed to explain this evolution in persons who are susceptible to developing panic disorder upon a "traumatic" panic attack. According to preparedness theory, some cues are more likely to condition than others, namely, those referring to internal, bodily signals of danger. The aim of the present study was to test this theory in a differential conditioning paradigm, making use of scripts referring to different internal, bodily sensations as conditioned stimulus (CS) and inhalation of 35% CO2 as unconditioned stimulus (UCS). Thirty-three healthy volunteers were assigned to three scripts conditions: "suffocation," "neutral," or "urgency." During acquisition, one of two versions of a particular script was always followed by an inhalation of 35% CO2 (CS+) and the other by room air (CS-). Acquisition was followed by a test phase, where only inhalations of room air were administered. In line with our hypothesis, only participants in the suffocation condition exhibited a selective conditioning effect. They were more fearful and showed a significantly higher increase in tidal volume than participants in the two control conditions. Results are discussed with relation to interoceptive conditioning, preparedness, and the possible role of tidal volume in PD.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)203-215
JournalBehavior Therapy
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2012


  • panic disorder
  • carbon dioxide
  • interoceptive fear conditioning
  • preparedness
  • tidal volume

Cite this