TY - JOUR
T1 - The Rise of a “Southern Gaze”
T2 - Global Power Shifts and Hierarchies in the International System
AU - Farias, Deborah Barros Leal
AU - Weinhardt, Clara
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2026. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Studies Association. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected] for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site-for further information please contact [email protected]
PY - 2026/7/1
Y1 - 2026/7/1
N2 - The international system is characterized by an unequal distribution of power. On many occasions, this inequality has been reflected in treaties, which grant different rights and obligations to certain countries. In this paper, we explore how such hierarchies change in light of the rise of Global South countries. To do so, we examine how shifts in power within the international system over the past 20 years have influenced the binary developing/developed country classification. Based on qualitative analysis of selected international organizations in the fields of trade, finance, and climate, we identify three main findings. First, a nascent “Southern Gaze,” where “developing” countries assess whether other countries are “developing” (or not). As a result, emerging contestation and competition within the “South” are shaping the contours of an increasingly fragmented global order. Second, we note the resilience of the development-based labels across the institutions analysed. Third, an increasing preference for less technocratic, more flexible approaches to classification emerges, most notably in newly established “developing” country-led International Organizations (IOs). Taken together, we find that the use of the developed/developing country classification and related hierarchies has become more fragmented. The growing influence of a “Southern gaze” comes with the resiliency of the “developing” label in tandem with a “complexification” of the “developed/developing” country binary. These findings speak to broader debates on the changing contours of a more polycentric global governance system and highlight the multiple sites of contestation that emerge—including within “developing” country-led IOs.
AB - The international system is characterized by an unequal distribution of power. On many occasions, this inequality has been reflected in treaties, which grant different rights and obligations to certain countries. In this paper, we explore how such hierarchies change in light of the rise of Global South countries. To do so, we examine how shifts in power within the international system over the past 20 years have influenced the binary developing/developed country classification. Based on qualitative analysis of selected international organizations in the fields of trade, finance, and climate, we identify three main findings. First, a nascent “Southern Gaze,” where “developing” countries assess whether other countries are “developing” (or not). As a result, emerging contestation and competition within the “South” are shaping the contours of an increasingly fragmented global order. Second, we note the resilience of the development-based labels across the institutions analysed. Third, an increasing preference for less technocratic, more flexible approaches to classification emerges, most notably in newly established “developing” country-led International Organizations (IOs). Taken together, we find that the use of the developed/developing country classification and related hierarchies has become more fragmented. The growing influence of a “Southern gaze” comes with the resiliency of the “developing” label in tandem with a “complexification” of the “developed/developing” country binary. These findings speak to broader debates on the changing contours of a more polycentric global governance system and highlight the multiple sites of contestation that emerge—including within “developing” country-led IOs.
KW - developing countries
KW - differentiation
KW - Global South
KW - hierarchy
U2 - 10.1093/isagsq/ksag093
DO - 10.1093/isagsq/ksag093
M3 - Article
SN - 2634-3797
VL - 6
JO - Global Studies Quarterly
JF - Global Studies Quarterly
IS - 3
M1 - ksag093
ER -