The Right to Be Heard in Composite Investment Screening Procedures Under Regulation 2019/452

Jens Hillebrand Pohl

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-68253-8_31

The Right to Be Heard in Composite Investment Screening Procedures Under Regulation 2019/452

Jens Hillebrand Pohl^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › Academic

Abstract

This contribution sets forth two arguments: First, foreign investors are able to influence investment screening opinions issued by the European Commission by exercising their right to be heard with respect to the truthfulness and relevance of the facts on which such an opinion is based. Second, through the Commission’s disclosure of such facts and their legal characterisation before it issues its opinion, affected investors can attain a level of certainty that to some extent compensates for the inherently dynamic and indeterminate screening criteria of security and public order.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	The future of legal Europe: will we trust in it?
Subtitle of host publication	Liber amicorum in honour of Wolfgang Heusel
Editors	Gavin Barrett, Jean-Philippe Rageade, Diana Wallis , Heinz Weil
Place of Publication	Cham
Publisher	Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Pages	647-661
Number of pages	15
ISBN (Electronic)	9783030682538
ISBN (Print)	9783030682521, 9783030682552
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68253-8_31
Publication status	Published - 12 May 2021

Access to Document

10.1007/978-3-030-68253-8_31

Cite this

@inbook{9d076018d19c40188532b976fe27fa03,

title = "The Right to Be Heard in Composite Investment Screening Procedures Under Regulation 2019/452",

abstract = "This contribution sets forth two arguments: First, foreign investors are able to influence investment screening opinions issued by the European Commission by exercising their right to be heard with respect to the truthfulness and relevance of the facts on which such an opinion is based. Second, through the Commission{\textquoteright}s disclosure of such facts and their legal characterisation before it issues its opinion, affected investors can attain a level of certainty that to some extent compensates for the inherently dynamic and indeterminate screening criteria of security and public order.",

author = "Pohl, \{Jens Hillebrand\}",

year = "2021",

month = may,

day = "12",

doi = "10.1007/978-3-030-68253-8\_31",

language = "English",

isbn = "9783030682521",

pages = "647--661",

editor = "Gavin Barrett and Jean-Philippe Rageade and \{Wallis \}, \{Diana \} and Weil, \{Heinz \}",

booktitle = "The future of legal Europe: will we trust in it?",

publisher = "Springer Nature Switzerland AG",

address = "Switzerland",

}

The Right to Be Heard in Composite Investment Screening Procedures Under Regulation 2019/452. / Pohl, Jens Hillebrand.
The future of legal Europe: will we trust in it? : Liber amicorum in honour of Wolfgang Heusel. ed. / Gavin Barrett; Jean-Philippe Rageade; Diana Wallis ; Heinz Weil. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2021. p. 647-661.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › Academic

TY - CHAP

T1 - The Right to Be Heard in Composite Investment Screening Procedures Under Regulation 2019/452

AU - Pohl, Jens Hillebrand

PY - 2021/5/12

Y1 - 2021/5/12

N2 - This contribution sets forth two arguments: First, foreign investors are able to influence investment screening opinions issued by the European Commission by exercising their right to be heard with respect to the truthfulness and relevance of the facts on which such an opinion is based. Second, through the Commission’s disclosure of such facts and their legal characterisation before it issues its opinion, affected investors can attain a level of certainty that to some extent compensates for the inherently dynamic and indeterminate screening criteria of security and public order.

AB - This contribution sets forth two arguments: First, foreign investors are able to influence investment screening opinions issued by the European Commission by exercising their right to be heard with respect to the truthfulness and relevance of the facts on which such an opinion is based. Second, through the Commission’s disclosure of such facts and their legal characterisation before it issues its opinion, affected investors can attain a level of certainty that to some extent compensates for the inherently dynamic and indeterminate screening criteria of security and public order.

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-68253-8_31

DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-68253-8_31

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9783030682521

SN - 9783030682552

SP - 647

EP - 661

BT - The future of legal Europe: will we trust in it?

A2 - Barrett, Gavin

A2 - Rageade, Jean-Philippe

A2 - Wallis , Diana

A2 - Weil, Heinz

PB - Springer Nature Switzerland AG

CY - Cham

ER -

The Right to Be Heard in Composite Investment Screening Procedures Under Regulation 2019/452

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this