The Return of the Repressed: The Persistent and Problematic Claims of Long-Forgotten Trauma

Henry Otgaar, Mark L Howe, Lawrence Patihis, Harald Merckelbach, Steven Jay Lynn, Scott O Lilienfeld, Elizabeth F Loftus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Can purely psychological trauma lead to a complete blockage of autobiographical memories? This long-standing question about the existence of repressed memories has been at the heart of one of the most heated debates in modern psychology. These so-called memory wars originated in the 1990s, and many scholars have assumed that they are over. We demonstrate that this assumption is incorrect and that the controversial issue of repressed memories is alive and well and may even be on the rise. We review converging research and data from legal cases indicating that the topic of repressed memories remains active in clinical, legal, and academic settings. We show that the belief in repressed memories occurs on a nontrivial scale (58%) and appears to have increased among clinical psychologists since the 1990s. We also demonstrate that the scientifically controversial concept of dissociative amnesia, which we argue is a substitute term for memory repression, has gained in popularity. Finally, we review work on the adverse side effects of certain psychotherapeutic techniques, some of which may be linked to the recovery of repressed memories. The memory wars have not vanished. They have continued to endure and contribute to potentially damaging consequences in clinical, legal, and academic contexts.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1745691619862306
Pages (from-to)1072-1095
Number of pages24
JournalPerspectives on Psychological Science
Volume14
Issue number6
Early online date4 Oct 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2019

Keywords

  • memory wars
  • repressed memory
  • repression
  • false memory
  • recovered memory
  • therapy
  • CHILDHOOD SEXUAL-ABUSE
  • LATERAL EYE-MOVEMENTS
  • FALSE MEMORIES
  • EYEWITNESS MEMORY
  • CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS
  • IDENTIFICATION ACCURACY
  • FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGIST
  • GENERAL ACCEPTANCE
  • COGNITIVE FAILURES
  • RECOVERED MEMORIES

Cite this

Otgaar, Henry ; Howe, Mark L ; Patihis, Lawrence ; Merckelbach, Harald ; Lynn, Steven Jay ; Lilienfeld, Scott O ; Loftus, Elizabeth F. / The Return of the Repressed : The Persistent and Problematic Claims of Long-Forgotten Trauma. In: Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2019 ; Vol. 14, No. 6. pp. 1072-1095.
@article{c9ef117deabf44bfa9498162407244b4,
title = "The Return of the Repressed: The Persistent and Problematic Claims of Long-Forgotten Trauma",
abstract = "Can purely psychological trauma lead to a complete blockage of autobiographical memories? This long-standing question about the existence of repressed memories has been at the heart of one of the most heated debates in modern psychology. These so-called memory wars originated in the 1990s, and many scholars have assumed that they are over. We demonstrate that this assumption is incorrect and that the controversial issue of repressed memories is alive and well and may even be on the rise. We review converging research and data from legal cases indicating that the topic of repressed memories remains active in clinical, legal, and academic settings. We show that the belief in repressed memories occurs on a nontrivial scale (58{\%}) and appears to have increased among clinical psychologists since the 1990s. We also demonstrate that the scientifically controversial concept of dissociative amnesia, which we argue is a substitute term for memory repression, has gained in popularity. Finally, we review work on the adverse side effects of certain psychotherapeutic techniques, some of which may be linked to the recovery of repressed memories. The memory wars have not vanished. They have continued to endure and contribute to potentially damaging consequences in clinical, legal, and academic contexts.",
keywords = "memory wars, repressed memory, repression, false memory, recovered memory, therapy, CHILDHOOD SEXUAL-ABUSE, LATERAL EYE-MOVEMENTS, FALSE MEMORIES, EYEWITNESS MEMORY, CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS, IDENTIFICATION ACCURACY, FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGIST, GENERAL ACCEPTANCE, COGNITIVE FAILURES, RECOVERED MEMORIES",
author = "Henry Otgaar and Howe, {Mark L} and Lawrence Patihis and Harald Merckelbach and Lynn, {Steven Jay} and Lilienfeld, {Scott O} and Loftus, {Elizabeth F}",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1177/1745691619862306",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "1072--1095",
journal = "Perspectives on Psychological Science",
issn = "1745-6916",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "6",

}

The Return of the Repressed : The Persistent and Problematic Claims of Long-Forgotten Trauma. / Otgaar, Henry; Howe, Mark L; Patihis, Lawrence; Merckelbach, Harald; Lynn, Steven Jay; Lilienfeld, Scott O; Loftus, Elizabeth F.

In: Perspectives on Psychological Science, Vol. 14, No. 6, 1745691619862306, 11.2019, p. 1072-1095.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Return of the Repressed

T2 - The Persistent and Problematic Claims of Long-Forgotten Trauma

AU - Otgaar, Henry

AU - Howe, Mark L

AU - Patihis, Lawrence

AU - Merckelbach, Harald

AU - Lynn, Steven Jay

AU - Lilienfeld, Scott O

AU - Loftus, Elizabeth F

PY - 2019/11

Y1 - 2019/11

N2 - Can purely psychological trauma lead to a complete blockage of autobiographical memories? This long-standing question about the existence of repressed memories has been at the heart of one of the most heated debates in modern psychology. These so-called memory wars originated in the 1990s, and many scholars have assumed that they are over. We demonstrate that this assumption is incorrect and that the controversial issue of repressed memories is alive and well and may even be on the rise. We review converging research and data from legal cases indicating that the topic of repressed memories remains active in clinical, legal, and academic settings. We show that the belief in repressed memories occurs on a nontrivial scale (58%) and appears to have increased among clinical psychologists since the 1990s. We also demonstrate that the scientifically controversial concept of dissociative amnesia, which we argue is a substitute term for memory repression, has gained in popularity. Finally, we review work on the adverse side effects of certain psychotherapeutic techniques, some of which may be linked to the recovery of repressed memories. The memory wars have not vanished. They have continued to endure and contribute to potentially damaging consequences in clinical, legal, and academic contexts.

AB - Can purely psychological trauma lead to a complete blockage of autobiographical memories? This long-standing question about the existence of repressed memories has been at the heart of one of the most heated debates in modern psychology. These so-called memory wars originated in the 1990s, and many scholars have assumed that they are over. We demonstrate that this assumption is incorrect and that the controversial issue of repressed memories is alive and well and may even be on the rise. We review converging research and data from legal cases indicating that the topic of repressed memories remains active in clinical, legal, and academic settings. We show that the belief in repressed memories occurs on a nontrivial scale (58%) and appears to have increased among clinical psychologists since the 1990s. We also demonstrate that the scientifically controversial concept of dissociative amnesia, which we argue is a substitute term for memory repression, has gained in popularity. Finally, we review work on the adverse side effects of certain psychotherapeutic techniques, some of which may be linked to the recovery of repressed memories. The memory wars have not vanished. They have continued to endure and contribute to potentially damaging consequences in clinical, legal, and academic contexts.

KW - memory wars

KW - repressed memory

KW - repression

KW - false memory

KW - recovered memory

KW - therapy

KW - CHILDHOOD SEXUAL-ABUSE

KW - LATERAL EYE-MOVEMENTS

KW - FALSE MEMORIES

KW - EYEWITNESS MEMORY

KW - CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS

KW - IDENTIFICATION ACCURACY

KW - FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGIST

KW - GENERAL ACCEPTANCE

KW - COGNITIVE FAILURES

KW - RECOVERED MEMORIES

U2 - 10.1177/1745691619862306

DO - 10.1177/1745691619862306

M3 - Article

C2 - 31584864

VL - 14

SP - 1072

EP - 1095

JO - Perspectives on Psychological Science

JF - Perspectives on Psychological Science

SN - 1745-6916

IS - 6

M1 - 1745691619862306

ER -