The psychological study of conspiracy theories: Strengths and limitations

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial › Academic › peer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Original language	English
Article number	101465
Pages (from-to)	1-4
Number of pages	4
Journal	Current Opinion in Psychology
Volume	48
Early online date	6 Sept 2022
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101465
Publication status	Published - Dec 2022

Access to Document

@article{910d466459144a13bb9a8306ccf1b24f,

title = "The psychological study of conspiracy theories: Strengths and limitations",

author = "\{van Prooijen\}, Jan-Willem and Roland Imhoff",

year = "2022",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101465",

language = "English",

volume = "48",

pages = "1--4",

journal = "Current Opinion in Psychology",

issn = "2352-250X",

publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The psychological study of conspiracy theories

T2 - Strengths and limitations

AU - van Prooijen, Jan-Willem

AU - Imhoff, Roland

PY - 2022/12

Y1 - 2022/12

U2 - 10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101465

DO - 10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101465

M3 - Editorial

C2 - 36191463

SN - 2352-250X

VL - 48

SP - 1

EP - 4

JO - Current Opinion in Psychology

JF - Current Opinion in Psychology

M1 - 101465

ER -