TY - JOUR
T1 - The Practice of Urban Experimentation in Dutch City Labs
AU - Scholl, Christian
AU - de Kraker, Joop
N1 - Funding Information:
The network of Dutch city labs consists of all labs that have received a grant from the Creative Industries Fund NL (‘Stimuleringsfonds voor de Creatieve Industrie,’ from here on called CIF-NL), which is a national fund to support innovation in architecture and urbanism, design, and digital culture (CIF-NL, n.d.-a). With the network, CIF-NL aims to promote the exchange of knowledge and expertise among Dutch city labs. Between 2014 and 2018, CIF-NL launched a series of Open Calls directed at city labs and focusing on new ways of addressing urgent urban development issues. Successful applicants received grants from CIF-NL of around 25,000€ as temporary financial support for their activities (CIF-NL, n.d.-b). Our choice of this research population was based on having access to the network through collaboration with CIF-NL and on the intended role of the city labs in urban planning and development as evident from the Open Call texts (CIF-NL, n.d.-c).
Funding Information:
Of the 17 responding city labs, five were located in Rotterdam and the other 12 were relatively evenly distributed across the rest of the Netherlands (see Supplementary File 3). The average ‘age’ of the labs at the time of the survey was 3–4 years and the ‘age’ range was from 1 to 7 years. About a third of the labs (six) received financial support from the local government and operated under the responsibility of the municipality, while the remaining two thirds (11) operated independently and received funding from a variety of sources or generated some income from activities. Half of the labs (nine) employed one or more paid lab officials, usually the coordinators, while in most of the other labs a financial compensation was paid for free-lance specified services for the lab. For events or projects, all these labs made use of unpaid volunteers. Only two labs relied completely on volunteers. The core team running the lab usually consisted of local creative professionals (e.g., designers, architects, urbanists) and active, engaged residents. Only three of the responding labs indicated that local government officials formed the core team or were part of it.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors; licensee Cogitatio (Lisbon, Portugal).
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - ‘Urban planning by experiment’ can be seen as an approach that uses experimentation to innovate and improve urban planning instruments, approaches, and outcomes. Nowadays, urban experiments—interventions in the city with the aim to innovate, learn, or gain experience—are increasingly taking place in the context of Urban Living Labs. In the Netherlands, a certain type of Urban Living Lab, called city labs, is flourishing, and it has been suggested that these labs could make an important contribution to ‘urban planning by experiment.’ However, previous studies have indicated that this will depend on how experimentation is conducted in these labs. To obtain a more comprehensive picture of the practice of experimentation, we conducted a survey among Dutch city labs, supplemented by individual and group interviews with practitioners from a small subset of the 17 responding labs. We conclude that there is a poor match between the practice of experimentation in Dutch city labs and the characteristics that are considered to support effective ‘urban planning by experiment’ (i.e., a structured approach to experimentation, co-creation of experiments, active and targeted dissemination of lessons learned, and experiments as linking pins between municipal policy goals and the needs of urban society). This suggests that the current contribution of Dutch city labs to ‘urban planning by experiment’ is probably quite limited. Further research is needed to determine whether the typical practice of experimentation encountered in the Dutch city labs, i.e., action-oriented, resource-limited, and largely driven by opportunities, is also found in Urban Living Labs elsewhere.
AB - ‘Urban planning by experiment’ can be seen as an approach that uses experimentation to innovate and improve urban planning instruments, approaches, and outcomes. Nowadays, urban experiments—interventions in the city with the aim to innovate, learn, or gain experience—are increasingly taking place in the context of Urban Living Labs. In the Netherlands, a certain type of Urban Living Lab, called city labs, is flourishing, and it has been suggested that these labs could make an important contribution to ‘urban planning by experiment.’ However, previous studies have indicated that this will depend on how experimentation is conducted in these labs. To obtain a more comprehensive picture of the practice of experimentation, we conducted a survey among Dutch city labs, supplemented by individual and group interviews with practitioners from a small subset of the 17 responding labs. We conclude that there is a poor match between the practice of experimentation in Dutch city labs and the characteristics that are considered to support effective ‘urban planning by experiment’ (i.e., a structured approach to experimentation, co-creation of experiments, active and targeted dissemination of lessons learned, and experiments as linking pins between municipal policy goals and the needs of urban society). This suggests that the current contribution of Dutch city labs to ‘urban planning by experiment’ is probably quite limited. Further research is needed to determine whether the typical practice of experimentation encountered in the Dutch city labs, i.e., action-oriented, resource-limited, and largely driven by opportunities, is also found in Urban Living Labs elsewhere.
KW - city labs
KW - learning
KW - practice
KW - urban experimentation
KW - urban living labs
KW - urban planning innovation
U2 - 10.17645/up.v6i1.3626
DO - 10.17645/up.v6i1.3626
M3 - Article
SN - 2183-7635
VL - 6
SP - 161
EP - 170
JO - Urban Planning
JF - Urban Planning
IS - 1
M1 - 3626
ER -