Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The perceived functional benefit of dynamic arm supports in daily life

  • Loek Van Der Heide*
  • , Luc De Witte
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Dynamic arm supports are provided to assist with activities of daily living (ADLs) in people with limited upperlimb function. However, the perceived functional benefit of these devices in daily life is unknown. Insight into the functional benefit may give direction to the development of new devices and may affect the factors that patients and their health care providers consider during the selection process of a device. A cross-sectional study involving 23 Dutch experienced dynamic arm support users was performed in the Netherlands. The study included a questionnaire, an interview, and an observation of ADL task performance in the domestic setting. Twenty participants completed this study. Five users had a large perceived functional benefit, nine a moderate benefit, and five no benefit (one was unable to indicate the benefit). People with limited functional abilities benefited most. Participants varied in the amount of device use, activities the device is used for, and reasons for using (or not using) the device. On an individual level, selection using a selection tool and a good evaluation of the prescription could improve user-device matches.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1139-1150
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Rehabilitation Research and Development
Volume53
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2016

Keywords

  • Activities of daily living
  • Assistive technology
  • Dynamic arm supports
  • Field trial
  • Functional benefit
  • Neuromuscular disorders
  • Occupational therapy
  • Orthotic devices
  • Rehabilitation
  • Upper limb

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The perceived functional benefit of dynamic arm supports in daily life'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this