The need to customise innovation indicators in developing countries

Michiko Iizuka, Hugo Hollanders

Research output: Book/ReportReportProfessional

Abstract

Innovation is becoming more and more important as a driver of economic growth. In developed countries, a diverse set of innovation indicators has been developed to monitor innovation performance and the impact of innovation policies. Developing countries have been late to jump on this bandwagon and are now faced with a set of well-established innovation indicators that might not be that well suited to measure innovation in their economies. Existing innovation indicators can be broadly classified into three different types: Science & Technology (S&T) indicators, Innovation survey indicators, and Composite innovation indicators combining different indicators, including S&T and Innovation survey data, into one indicator. All of these have their own particular strengths and weaknesses, and they score above or below average on a wide range of attributes considered to be favourable, if not downright necessary, for innovation indicators. This paper argues that, for innovation indicators, and for innovation survey indicators in particular, data collection has to be customised to the different socio-economic structures of developing countries. For this, the definition of innovation has to become more inclusive by recognising the multitude of innovation actors and processes in developing countries. Developing countries also need to build competence regarding innovation indicators, not only within their statistical systems but also among their policy makers.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherUNU-MERIT working papers
Volume2017
Edition032
Publication statusPublished - 10 Aug 2017

Keywords

  • innovation
  • indicators
  • developing countries
  • policy use

Cite this

Iizuka, Michiko ; Hollanders, Hugo. / The need to customise innovation indicators in developing countries. 032 ed. UNU-MERIT working papers, 2017.
@book{00229d7d0a9e4b818201c6757b872908,
title = "The need to customise innovation indicators in developing countries",
abstract = "Innovation is becoming more and more important as a driver of economic growth. In developed countries, a diverse set of innovation indicators has been developed to monitor innovation performance and the impact of innovation policies. Developing countries have been late to jump on this bandwagon and are now faced with a set of well-established innovation indicators that might not be that well suited to measure innovation in their economies. Existing innovation indicators can be broadly classified into three different types: Science & Technology (S&T) indicators, Innovation survey indicators, and Composite innovation indicators combining different indicators, including S&T and Innovation survey data, into one indicator. All of these have their own particular strengths and weaknesses, and they score above or below average on a wide range of attributes considered to be favourable, if not downright necessary, for innovation indicators. This paper argues that, for innovation indicators, and for innovation survey indicators in particular, data collection has to be customised to the different socio-economic structures of developing countries. For this, the definition of innovation has to become more inclusive by recognising the multitude of innovation actors and processes in developing countries. Developing countries also need to build competence regarding innovation indicators, not only within their statistical systems but also among their policy makers.",
keywords = "innovation, indicators, developing countries, policy use",
author = "Michiko Iizuka and Hugo Hollanders",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "10",
language = "English",
volume = "2017",
publisher = "UNU-MERIT working papers",
edition = "032",

}

Iizuka, M & Hollanders, H 2017, The need to customise innovation indicators in developing countries. vol. 2017, 032 edn, UNU-MERIT working papers.

The need to customise innovation indicators in developing countries. / Iizuka, Michiko; Hollanders, Hugo.

032 ed. UNU-MERIT working papers, 2017.

Research output: Book/ReportReportProfessional

TY - BOOK

T1 - The need to customise innovation indicators in developing countries

AU - Iizuka, Michiko

AU - Hollanders, Hugo

PY - 2017/8/10

Y1 - 2017/8/10

N2 - Innovation is becoming more and more important as a driver of economic growth. In developed countries, a diverse set of innovation indicators has been developed to monitor innovation performance and the impact of innovation policies. Developing countries have been late to jump on this bandwagon and are now faced with a set of well-established innovation indicators that might not be that well suited to measure innovation in their economies. Existing innovation indicators can be broadly classified into three different types: Science & Technology (S&T) indicators, Innovation survey indicators, and Composite innovation indicators combining different indicators, including S&T and Innovation survey data, into one indicator. All of these have their own particular strengths and weaknesses, and they score above or below average on a wide range of attributes considered to be favourable, if not downright necessary, for innovation indicators. This paper argues that, for innovation indicators, and for innovation survey indicators in particular, data collection has to be customised to the different socio-economic structures of developing countries. For this, the definition of innovation has to become more inclusive by recognising the multitude of innovation actors and processes in developing countries. Developing countries also need to build competence regarding innovation indicators, not only within their statistical systems but also among their policy makers.

AB - Innovation is becoming more and more important as a driver of economic growth. In developed countries, a diverse set of innovation indicators has been developed to monitor innovation performance and the impact of innovation policies. Developing countries have been late to jump on this bandwagon and are now faced with a set of well-established innovation indicators that might not be that well suited to measure innovation in their economies. Existing innovation indicators can be broadly classified into three different types: Science & Technology (S&T) indicators, Innovation survey indicators, and Composite innovation indicators combining different indicators, including S&T and Innovation survey data, into one indicator. All of these have their own particular strengths and weaknesses, and they score above or below average on a wide range of attributes considered to be favourable, if not downright necessary, for innovation indicators. This paper argues that, for innovation indicators, and for innovation survey indicators in particular, data collection has to be customised to the different socio-economic structures of developing countries. For this, the definition of innovation has to become more inclusive by recognising the multitude of innovation actors and processes in developing countries. Developing countries also need to build competence regarding innovation indicators, not only within their statistical systems but also among their policy makers.

KW - innovation

KW - indicators

KW - developing countries

KW - policy use

M3 - Report

VL - 2017

BT - The need to customise innovation indicators in developing countries

PB - UNU-MERIT working papers

ER -