The multilevel regulation of complex policy problems: Uncertainty and the swine flu pandemic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

En this article aims at understanding the challenges of tackling complex policy problems in multilevel governance. In order to better grasp the multilevel regulation of complex policy problems, it is needed to understand how uncertainty and scientific expertise are dealt with. We investigate this via the regulation of pandemics by the eu and the who, with the h1n1 pandemic of 2009 as critical case. The analysis of the multilevel practice reveals that the attitude toward uncertainty fundamentally differed between the global (who) and the european level. At the global level a classic speaking truth to power approach involved the denial of uncertainty, while at the eu level the assigned role of providing scientific expertise was interpreted as a necessity to openly communicate about uncertainty. While the global approach was heavily criticized, the uncertainty communication at the european level was much appreciated.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)80-98
JournalEuropean Policy Analysis
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2019

Cite this

@article{591bb769118d4eb08c0fb8a04c10538b,
title = "The multilevel regulation of complex policy problems: Uncertainty and the swine flu pandemic",
abstract = "En this article aims at understanding the challenges of tackling complex policy problems in multilevel governance. In order to better grasp the multilevel regulation of complex policy problems, it is needed to understand how uncertainty and scientific expertise are dealt with. We investigate this via the regulation of pandemics by the eu and the who, with the h1n1 pandemic of 2009 as critical case. The analysis of the multilevel practice reveals that the attitude toward uncertainty fundamentally differed between the global (who) and the european level. At the global level a classic speaking truth to power approach involved the denial of uncertainty, while at the eu level the assigned role of providing scientific expertise was interpreted as a necessity to openly communicate about uncertainty. While the global approach was heavily criticized, the uncertainty communication at the european level was much appreciated.",
author = "Esther Versluis and {van Asselt}, M. and Jinhee Kim",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1002/epa2.1064",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "80--98",
journal = "European Policy Analysis",
number = "1",

}

The multilevel regulation of complex policy problems: Uncertainty and the swine flu pandemic. / Versluis, Esther; van Asselt, M.; Kim, Jinhee.

In: European Policy Analysis, Vol. 5, No. 1, 05.2019, p. 80-98.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The multilevel regulation of complex policy problems: Uncertainty and the swine flu pandemic

AU - Versluis, Esther

AU - van Asselt, M.

AU - Kim, Jinhee

PY - 2019/5

Y1 - 2019/5

N2 - En this article aims at understanding the challenges of tackling complex policy problems in multilevel governance. In order to better grasp the multilevel regulation of complex policy problems, it is needed to understand how uncertainty and scientific expertise are dealt with. We investigate this via the regulation of pandemics by the eu and the who, with the h1n1 pandemic of 2009 as critical case. The analysis of the multilevel practice reveals that the attitude toward uncertainty fundamentally differed between the global (who) and the european level. At the global level a classic speaking truth to power approach involved the denial of uncertainty, while at the eu level the assigned role of providing scientific expertise was interpreted as a necessity to openly communicate about uncertainty. While the global approach was heavily criticized, the uncertainty communication at the european level was much appreciated.

AB - En this article aims at understanding the challenges of tackling complex policy problems in multilevel governance. In order to better grasp the multilevel regulation of complex policy problems, it is needed to understand how uncertainty and scientific expertise are dealt with. We investigate this via the regulation of pandemics by the eu and the who, with the h1n1 pandemic of 2009 as critical case. The analysis of the multilevel practice reveals that the attitude toward uncertainty fundamentally differed between the global (who) and the european level. At the global level a classic speaking truth to power approach involved the denial of uncertainty, while at the eu level the assigned role of providing scientific expertise was interpreted as a necessity to openly communicate about uncertainty. While the global approach was heavily criticized, the uncertainty communication at the european level was much appreciated.

U2 - 10.1002/epa2.1064

DO - 10.1002/epa2.1064

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 80

EP - 98

JO - European Policy Analysis

JF - European Policy Analysis

IS - 1

ER -